Ian (one of the security people) said they will not support storing this kind of decisions. Instead, website owners should fix the bad certificates.Bad user experience, of course. :(
☆PhistucK On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:17, shirish <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > I am sure we all have had this statement come to us. It came to me > while going to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=594789 > > > The site's security certificate is not trusted! > You attempted to reach bugzilla.gnome.org, but the server presented a > certificate issued by an entity that is not trusted by your computer's > operating system. This may mean that the server has generated its own > security credentials, which Chromium cannot rely on for identity > information, or an attacker may be trying to intercept your > communications. You should not proceed, especially if you have never > seen this warning before for this site. > > It gives two buttons at the end . Proceed anyway and Back to whatever. > > there doesn't seem to be a way to store the same. > -- > Regards, > Shirish Agarwal > My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ > http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com > 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
