2009/9/20 shirish शिरीष <[email protected]>: > > in-line :- > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 19:40, dhhwai <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Well, here's a list of bug reports of many browsers which don't >> support SRV :-) (Mozilla's bug report dates from year 1999.) >> >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14328 >> https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6872 >> http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=22423 > > Thank you for supplying those bug links. Have subscribed to all the three > bugs. > > <snipped> > > What is interesting to see that there are 64 other users (excluding > me) who know and are interested in seeing this bug fixed. > > I think the mozilla bug-report as well as webkit bug-report > discussions are good enough to know why it is important. > -- > Regards, > Shirish Agarwal शिरीष अग्रवाल > My quotes in this email licensed under CC 3.0 > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ > http://flossexperiences.wordpress.com > 065C 6D79 A68C E7EA 52B3 8D70 950D 53FB 729A 8B17 > > > >
I would think the reason this is not a high priority is because with the advent of balancers that came about with the web, the use of SRV is not as necessary.. SRV was spawned for newer critical protocols so failover balancers are not required.. The web is just not considered as "essential" as making phone calls, etc.. The things SRV was created for.. The current web infrastructure (balancers/failovers/RR DNS), is so widely deployed and successful, the need to change is very low... -Greg --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
