I did not know that!Was it mentioned in the release notes? I guess not, since I read every line of them (or at least, I think I do). Too bad it was not, if it were not.
Thank you! ☆PhistucK On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 03:58, Bapabooiee <[email protected]> wrote: > > Really simple here. As most of you should know, Chromium now has a > "Pin tab" feature (accessed via right-clicking a tab and hitting 'Pin > tab'). > > The whole premise of "pinning" something is to keep it there; usually > for a tab you want to be persistent with your browsing session. For > example, say you're uploading a rather large file to a server through > a web interface. You don't want it take-up extra room since you're > just gonna be browsing, and leaving the tab there while it does its > thing. And, you don't want to give its own window - so you decide to > just pin the tab. It gets pinned to the left, and minimizes the amount > of space it takes, making you happy. > > You decide to use the current Chrome window for just browsing, > occasionally checking the process of the tab that's uploading your > file. While browsing, you decide to use the "Close other tabs" > feature, expecting your pinned tab to stay persistent - because it's, > well, pinned. To your dismay, the tab you pinned was closed as well. > This does, in fact, not make you happy. > > Ending this predictable example, I think you know where I'm going with > this: What do you think about offering pin'd tabs the ability to be > immune to the "close other tabs" command? > > Thanks for reading, fair citizens. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
