Not on the mac yet :(. Windows has it, linux will have it soon. We'll
update here or on the release blog when there is news.

- a

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Edwin Khodabakchian
<edwin.khodabakch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I think that this is a good design decision. Is there a mac build
> which already has support for the browser action so that we can start
> to port our extensive?
> Thanks,
> Edwin
>
> On Oct 12, 2:41 pm, Aaron Boodman <a...@chromium.org> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> As a few of you have noticed from changes in the bug system, we've decided
>> to replace toolstrips with a new extensions UI surface area: browser
>> actions<http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/BrowserActions>
>> .
>> Here is what they look like:
>>
>> [image: browser_action.png]
>>
>> A browser action is a 19px image button that shows up in the main Chrome
>> toolbar to the right of the omnibox. They can be rendered from a static set
>> of images in your extension, or you can render them dynamically using the
>> HTML5 canvas.
>>
>> They can also optionally have a popup, which is implemented using HTML,
>> similar to how toolstrips worked.
>>
>> We will be disabling toolstrips before the beta release of Chrome 4, so we
>> encourage extension developers to start converting their extensions to use
>> browser actions soon. We'll be updating the docs in the coming weeks with
>> details.
>> Even though we are still in the dev channel of Chrome, where everything is
>> subject to change, we try to avoid ever breaking APIs. So we didn't come to
>> this decision lightly. The reason we did it that we got a lot of negative
>> feedback about the toolstrip shelf across the bottom of the browser. Many
>> users did not like the wasted space, particularly when only one extension
>> was installed.
>>
>> When we stepped back and thought about the use cases, we came to the
>> conclusion that most extensions don't really need to show complex UI in the
>> toolbar -- a single button with an expandable area is usually sufficient.
>> This also had the advantage of being a more prominent location and fitting
>> better with Chrome's sparse aesthetic.
>>
>> While we understand this change is frustrating and won't work perfectly for
>> every extension, we think it is for the best, and are excited to see what
>> you can do with it.
>>
>> If you want to get started even before we finish the docs, you can take a
>> look at our samples, which have already been converted:
>>
>>    -
>>    http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/test/data/exte...
>>    -
>>    http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/test/data/exte...
>>    -
>>    http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/test/data/exte...
>>    -
>>    http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/test/data/exte...
>>    -
>>    http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/test/data/exte...
>>
>> I'll post on this mailing list as the browser action API solidifies and the
>> documentation is completed.
>>
>> - a
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Chromium-extensions" group.
To post to this group, send email to chromium-extensions@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
chromium-extensions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to