ok thx. 2009/10/27 Nick Baum <nickb...@chromium.org>
> Hi Julien, > > We're working on some APIs to make this sort of request filtering possible, > but it won't happen for the initial release. In the meantime, filtering > using the content script is your best, if imperfect, option. > > Content scripts count as the page memory right now, since they run in the > renderer. > > -Nick > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Julien Tillay <djac...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> hello, >> In order to make an adblock+ doing the right job (and not hide some html >> elements or inject style after downloading them, and render them a short >> time etc), >> I wonder if there is a way to really intercept the requests done after the >> download of the html source code (javascript files, images or iframes >> etc...) ? >> >> I tried to use a xhr to load the source code in background, do the right >> job and then inject it in the tab but, it's ugly and doesn't works well. >> (can't watch all needed events) >> the goal is to avoid a large amount of useless data downloaded. you just >> have to look at the javascript code for some ads and you'll know why tabs >> take this huge memory. >> help :s >> >> and an other question about the content scripts, are they part of the >> memory took by the extension or are they add to the tabs affected ? >> >> -- >> Julien TILLAY >> >> >> >> > -- Julien TILLAY - tilla...@epitech.net - djac...@gmail.com 06.23.67.34.69 - GameDevLab - Persistant Studios tek3 - Epitech_2011 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-extensions" group. To post to this group, send email to chromium-extensions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to chromium-extensions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
