No, it should work for images (and things like text/plain). One reason people frequently want to do this is so that they can improve the rendering of images, eg by adding a black background or a nice border.
Here is the bug for this in our system. Feel free to star it if you want to track progress, though it is pretty low priority relative to other things right now: http://crbug.com/12082 - a On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Antony Sargent <asarg...@chromium.org> wrote: > It's definitely inconsistent. Do you have a use case where you'd want the > content script to run on non-html content urls? At first thought it seems > the bug may be that we run at document_end. > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 10:24 AM, donaddon <don...@verizon.net> wrote: >> >> I have a content script that runs at document_start. >> When I navigate to a direct image (or a PDF), my document_start >> content script doesn't appear to be loaded (my console.log statements >> aren't displayed). document_end scripts are loaded and are able to >> manipulate the DOM that wraps the image. >> >> Bug? >> >> Thanks! >> >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Chromium-extensions" group. To post to this group, send email to chromium-extensions@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to chromium-extensions+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-extensions?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
