Richard: Indeed you did! And that scheduled debate is almost worth a trip to London in and of itself. I'm sure the negatives will acquit themselves brilliantly. Sorry we missed you in Chicago - I guess I picked a bad week to go on vacation. --David Stejkowski In a message dated 5/12/2009 11:54:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
>>How seriously can O'Reilly damage Churchill's reputation? I'd rather see someone take on Mr. Buchanan. :) >> We already did; see David Freeman, "A Polemic, Not a History" in Finest Hour 139. But there's more fun to come, and it will be like shooting fish in a barrel. From FH 142 Ampersand column, by Paul Courtenay, upcoming: At 7 pm on Thursday 3 September—the 70th anniversary of the outbreak of World War II—Intelligence Squared will be hosting a debate at the Royal Geographical Society in Exhibition Road, London, on the motion: “This House believes Winston Churchill was more of a liability than an asset in the Second World War.” Professor Norman Stone and Pat Buchanan will be proposing the motion and Sir Martin Gilbert, Professor Anthony Beevor and Andrew Roberts will be opposing it. We look forward to this as much as Churchill and Lloyd George did to confronting the Commons old boys in 1905. Tickets to this blessed event are available from www.intelligencesquared.com. **************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy steps! (http://pr.atw ola.com/promoclk/100126575x1221322936x1201367173/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072&hmpgID=115&bcd =Mayfooter51209NO115) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ChurchillChat" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ChurchillChat?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
