I agree. When I look at Churchill's paintings vs. Hitler's, you see Sir Winston's flare for life coming alive in each stroke. Hitler's were far too accurate to be described as anything but 'perfection'. In my opinion, (as borne out by Churchill's reaction to the Sutherland painting), art needs heart and soul. Churchill had it, Hitler didn't. If one wants a perfect picture, take a photograph.
On Jul 1, 8:09 am, Bill Loytty <[email protected]> wrote: > http://mentalfloss.com/quiz/quiz.php?q=160 > > (I am FAR from an expert, but I only got one wrong. Hitler's > paintings always seemed very drab to me and even as a rank amateur, > they were easy to pick out) > > -- > --- > Bill Loytty > [email protected]http://blog.loytty.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ChurchillChat" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/churchillchat?hl=en.
