Dear Richard,
Yes - of course you are right : at least some serious editor somewhere will point out that specialist Churchill scholars entirely
refute this rubbish only written for self-publicity.
Silence may be the best form of contempt in some cases, but not in this one.
A.C.
=============
Seriously, is this even worthy of consideration?<<
Well, somebody DID ask. If we don't refute this stuff, it piles up and
stinks, like dead moss bunkers on the beaches of Staten Island.
A fellow managed to write a whole book about it, and to time it with
the Titanic Centenary and the magic name of Churchill: A sure ticket
to success. I promise you there will be wholly believing, admiring
reviews of it on Amazon, if they aren't already, just like the book
last year that blamed him for the Bengal Famine.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ChurchillChat" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/churchillchat?hl=en.
