See http://www.truedemocracy.net/td-17/07.html for history which conflicts with the Illuminati and the Masonic Temple conspiring together as Tim posts. The Illuminati used the Masonic Temple to conceal themselves. This would tend not to implicate the Masonic Temple in the deviance of the Illuminati as it was a cover for the Illuminati.
While it is true that the Constitution wasn't written to adhere to the Declaration of Independence, other work in my e-zine, tells why the Constitution doesn't adhere to the Articles of Confederation. Moreover, George Washington, himself, was assassinated by Illuminati Masonic doctors because President Washington was aware of Illuminati plans for his country.
Peace,
Arlene Johnson
Publisher/Author
http://www.truedemocracy.net the home of The Journal of History
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Aug 18, 2005 9:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [cia-drugs] Re: THE MASONIC FOUNDING OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
--- Patricia Johnson-Holm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Patgricia Johnson-Holm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: THE MASONIC FOUNDING OF THE UNITED
> OF AMERICA
> To: Tim cWhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
>
> There is no doubt about the founding of the
> Washington et al, goes back to the Masonic take over
> of our country. And here is the next part about
> that, that you need to know.
>
> First, the original Constitution was replaced as of
> July 9th 1789 by Washington etc. Look back to the
> original foundation papers.
>
> See for yourself the concepts expressed by the
> Declaration of Independence do not match what was
> put into the 1789 constitution.
>
> Next, look up the actual leaders of our country
> going back to before 1776. Why are they not
> acknowledged for their contribution? They are not
> acknowledged because what they contributed was not
> what the so called 'masonic' group wanted to agree
> with.
>
> Then think about why the name Liberty came about.
> The Liberty Bell(s), the Statue of Liberty go back
> to the naming of the this country. Why is it being
> written out of history?
>
> Also don't forget the importance of the Jesuits
> being disbanded in 1775, then reinstituted right
> after the money for the Louisana Purchase was paid
> out.
>
> All of this adds together to form a pattern of what
> was really transpiring, not just what the current
> top masons want you to believe. Anytime secracy is
> mandatory to stay in 'power' this indicates
> something is very WRONG. The first goal of the
> masons goes way back to the Stuarts. These goals are
> what the general public are told is supposed to be
> true about all of the 'masonic order.' Of course it
> is becoming common knowledge that the old goals are
> by no means the same as the current top masonic
> (jesuit) goals.
>
> Of course the everyday person did not want
> Revolutionary War with England. It was only with the
> 5% of the population mostly the ones fighting
> England in other ways, such as the Battle of Caledon
> (1746 Bonnie Prince Charlie and so on) that the
> Independence from England was demanded.
>
> With England so strung out trying to take over every
> area that the House of Stuart had established as
> mutual economic benefit. This made it possible for
> the new country Liberty, to 'win.'
>
> Supposedly, the French paid for the Revolution. But
> think of it this way, IF that were true why do we
> NOT speak FRENCH right now? Of course the answer is
> that the funds did NOT come from the good graces of
> King Louis.
>
> Why was the year 1789 chosen to take over Liberty?
> Was it because 'Bonnie Prince Charlie' Charles
> Edward Stuart ended up dead in 1788? Why was the
> French Rovolution in 1789? It looks to be for much
> the same reason. Are you aware that the House of
> Stuart was Royalty over France and several other
> countries? Yes, it is this connection that starts to
> make sense out of why things happened as they
> actually did. Not just according to the version some
> of the history books try to tell you. See for
> yourself the little details (and sometimes not so
> little details) reveal the TRUTH.
>
> So now you see why the evil side knew that the Date
> July 9th was very important not only in 1789, but
> also the response to it in 1947.
>
> Of course there is much more, but it is best to
> research these points for yourself.
>
> Patricia Johnson-Holm
>
>
>
> Tim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Masonic Founding of The United States of America
>
>
> Written by Administrator
> Friday, 19 November 2004
> by Alexander S. Holub
>
> The next time you hear from some fundamentalist
> Christian talking about how the United States of
> America was founded by a group of church-going
> Christians, as the fundamentalists claim they are,
> think about this:
>
> The revolution against England was NOT a popular
> idea.
> Most people in The Colonies were quite happy with
> the
> way things were going. The people who were concerned
> about the taxes were those who would have to pay the
> majority of the taxes: the wealthy, the factories,
> and
> the shop owners. The majority of people in this
> country worked either for themselves or for someone
> else. The Boston Tea Party, you will recall,
> occurred
> because of the tax on tea. The fact of the matter is
> that most of the people in The Colonies didn't drink
> tea. It was mainly the wealthy who retained that
> habit. It was, though, symbolic for the continued
> taxing to pay for the British nobility's excesses.
> Fundamentalist Christians have this mistaken idea
> that
> when The Declaration of Independence was signed,
> everyone stood in line to sign it. Actually, it took
> over 5 years for everyone to sign it. That was well
> after the Revolutionary War was won. Part of the
> problem was transportation the other part was that
> many of the signers weren't sure that breaking away
> from England was the best thing to do. After all,
> England was the greatest military and naval power in
> the world and their protection was an asset. So what
> if they taxed The Colonies? The taxes were necessary
> for having the British military and navy ready to
> defend them.
>
> Now, what about the Founding Fathers of the United
> States?
>
> Something like 98% of the Founding Fathers of the
> United States were MASONS. Their main religious
> affiliation was UNITARIAN. The rest were either
> Catholic or Church of England. If you will look at
> the
> Masonic rolls of Boston (MA), New York (NY),
> Philadelphia (PA), Richmond (VA) and a dozen other
> cities lining the east coast, it reads like a Who's
> Who in American History. Many of the historical
> figures who came to help The Colonies in their break
> from England (e.g. Lafayette from France and Polaski
> from Poland) were also Masons. In fact, many of the
> officers who were fighting on the British side were
> also Masons. Masons, at that time, were DEISTS. A
> deist is one who believes that a God created the
> world
> but that same God doesn't interfere with it. Most
> Christians are theists. A theist sees God
> interfering
> with or can interfere with what's happening in the
> world. (This isn't any different than the Pagans who
> believed that the gods interfered with the lives of
> humans.) In other words, the Founding Fathers of
> this
> country saw that what happens here was up to them.
> It
> wasn't God's will that The Colonies break away from
> England. It wasn't God's will that there be a United
> States of America. Nor was Manifest Destiny God's
> will. It wasn't God's will that the United States
> eventually become a world power.
>
> The Masonic tradition at that time was highly
> steeped
> in OCCULTISM. The Masons were all practicing
> CEREMONIAL MAGICIANS. George Washington, wearing a
> Masonic apron, actually performed a Masonic (occult)
> rite when the cornerstone of the capital was laid
> and
> he placed a box containing Masonic medallions in
> that
> cornerstone. The signing of the Declaration of
> Independence was based on astrological timing worked
> out by one of the Founding Fathers. July 4th, 1776
> at
> 12:00 noon at Philadelphia (PA) was very
> significant.
> That very time is when John Hancock placed his
> signature on the Declaration. They wanted to make
> sure
> that all of the "signs" were propitious for this
> infant country. Would Christians go to this trouble?
> Absolutely NOT! Consequently, the United States was
> founded by occultists based on occult principles.
>
> The Founding Fathers did NOT care for people who
> would
> manipulate The Bible for their own purposes. Their
> disdain for manipulative Christian religious
> philosophies and manipulative preachers is
> well-documented. People like Jerry Fallwell, Billy
> Graham, Oral Roberts, Kenneth Copeland, Gene Scott,
> Jimmy Swaggart, Peter Popov, Benny Hinn, and others
> of
> their ilk would bring out their anger. Read the
> works
> of Thomas Paine ("Common Sense") and Thomas
> Jefferson.
> (Fundamentalists conveniently over-look Jefferson's
> scathing attacks on these kinds of preachers.)
> Jefferson, himself, was so angry with these kinds of
> philosophies and people that he even wrote his own
> version of The Bible. The Bible that George
> Washington
> and many of the presidents took the oath of office
> on
> was, in fact, a Masonic Bible. That Bible is now in
> the Smithsonian.
>
> The Masonic tradition at that time was a powerful
> influence on the world. For centuries just about
> every
> Pope, Cardinal, Bishop, nobleman, the royalty, and
> many generals were Masons. Many important people
> were
> also Masons. Joseph Smith, the founder of the
> Mormons,
> was a Mason, as were many of the Baroque and
> Classical
> composers. Daniel Boone, Davy Crockett, Sam Houston,
> and more than half of the U.S. presidents were
> Masons.
> It was in the middle of the 19th century that THE
> CHURCH condemned the Masonic tradition and said they
> were all a bunch of devil worshippers. After The
> Church's condemnation of the Masonic tradition, the
> manipulative branches of Christianity took up the
> banner (even though they see The Catholic Church as
> in
> league with the devil) because it aided them in
> their
> cause " control of the masses.
>
> Another thing you need to consider is that the
> principles upon which The United States was founded
> upon were, by and large, NOT Christian principles.
> Freedom of religion is definitely not a Christian
> principle. Nor is the right to vote a Christian
> principle. Free education for everyone is also not a
> Christian ideal. Also excluded are freedom of
> speech,
> press, or assembly. But then, slavery was permitted
> by
> Christianity (see Eph. 6:5) and this verse was used
> by, what were, the Southern fundamentalists of the
> time. In essence, the rights of the individual were
> NOT Christian but were Masonic ideals.
>
> It's time that the facts be presented. Most people
> will not take the time to research and find the
> truth.
> Fundamentalists are always going around talking
> about
> The Truth, but when they are confronted by it they
> refuse to accept it. There are two types of
> ignorance:
> The first type of ignorance is that brought about by
> nature where an individual doesn't have the mental
> capacities to seek and/or understand it. The second
> type of ignorance is chosen ignorance. This is the
> byword of fundamentalist Christianity. Through
> half-truths (half-truths are whole lies), purposeful
> semantic manipulations, and feigned knowledge and
> wisdom they "trap(ped) you with gile (lies)" (as
> Paul
> said to the Corinthians). The Truth is out there.
> You
> need to find it for yourself. No one has it for you.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail for Mobile
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail
Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/
Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
OM
-----Original Message-----
From: Tim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Aug 18, 2005 9:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [cia-drugs] Re: THE MASONIC FOUNDING OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
--- Patricia Johnson-Holm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Patgricia Johnson-Holm
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: THE MASONIC FOUNDING OF THE UNITED
> OF AMERICA
> To: Tim cWhite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
>
> There is no doubt about the founding of the
> Washington et al, goes back to the Masonic take over
> of our country. And here is the next part about
> that, that you need to know.
>
> First, the original Constitution was replaced as of
> July 9th 1789 by Washington etc. Look back to the
> original foundation papers.
>
> See for yourself the concepts expressed by the
> Declaration of Independence do not match what was
> put into the 1789 constitution.
>
> Next, look up the actual leaders of our country
> going back to before 1776. Why are they not
> acknowledged for their contribution? They are not
> acknowledged because what they contributed was not
> what the so called 'masonic' group wanted to agree
> with.
>
> Then think about why the name Liberty came about.
> The Liberty Bell(s), the Statue of Liberty go back
> to the naming of the this country. Why is it being
> written out of history?
>
> Also don't forget the importance of the Jesuits
> being disbanded in 1775, then reinstituted right
> after the money for the Louisana Purchase was paid
> out.
>
> All of this adds together to form a pattern of what
> was really transpiring, not just what the current
> top masons want you to believe. Anytime secracy is
> mandatory to stay in 'power' this indicates
> something is very WRONG. The first goal of the
> masons goes way back to the Stuarts. These goals are
> what the general public are told is supposed to be
> true about all of the 'masonic order.' Of course it
> is becoming common knowledge that the old goals are
> by no means the same as the current top masonic
> (jesuit) goals.
>
> Of course the everyday person did not want
> Revolutionary War with England. It was only with the
> 5% of the population mostly the ones fighting
> England in other ways, such as the Battle of Caledon
> (1746 Bonnie Prince Charlie and so on) that the
> Independence from England was demanded.
>
> With England so strung out trying to take over every
> area that the House of Stuart had established as
> mutual economic benefit. This made it possible for
> the new country Liberty, to 'win.'
>
> Supposedly, the French paid for the Revolution. But
> think of it this way, IF that were true why do we
> NOT speak FRENCH right now? Of course the answer is
> that the funds did NOT come from the good graces of
> King Louis.
>
> Why was the year 1789 chosen to take over Liberty?
> Was it because 'Bonnie Prince Charlie' Charles
> Edward Stuart ended up dead in 1788? Why was the
> French Rovolution in 1789? It looks to be for much
> the same reason. Are you aware that the House of
> Stuart was Royalty over France and several other
> countries? Yes, it is this connection that starts to
> make sense out of why things happened as they
> actually did. Not just according to the version some
> of the history books try to tell you. See for
> yourself the little details (and sometimes not so
> little details) reveal the TRUTH.
>
> So now you see why the evil side knew that the Date
> July 9th was very important not only in 1789, but
> also the response to it in 1947.
>
> Of course there is much more, but it is best to
> research these points for yourself.
>
> Patricia Johnson-Holm
>
>
>
> Tim White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Masonic Founding of The United States of America
>
>
> Written by Administrator
> Friday, 19 November 2004
> by Alexander S. Holub
>
> The next time you hear from some fundamentalist
> Christian talking about how the United States of
> America was founded by a group of church-going
> Christians, as the fundamentalists claim they are,
> think about this:
>
> The revolution against England was NOT a popular
> idea.
> Most people in The Colonies were quite happy with
> the
> way things were going. The people who were concerned
> about the taxes were those who would have to pay the
> majority of the taxes: the wealthy, the factories,
> and
> the shop owners. The majority of people in this
> country worked either for themselves or for someone
> else. The Boston Tea Party, you will recall,
> occurred
> because of the tax on tea. The fact of the matter is
> that most of the people in The Colonies didn't drink
> tea. It was mainly the wealthy who retained that
> habit. It was, though, symbolic for the continued
> taxing to pay for the British nobility's excesses.
> Fundamentalist Christians have this mistaken idea
> that
> when The Declaration of Independence was signed,
> everyone stood in line to sign it. Actually, it took
> over 5 years for everyone to sign it. That was well
> after the Revolutionary War was won. Part of the
> problem was transportation the other part was that
> many of the signers weren't sure that breaking away
> from England was the best thing to do. After all,
> England was the greatest military and naval power in
> the world and their protection was an asset. So what
> if they taxed The Colonies? The taxes were necessary
> for having the British military and navy ready to
> defend them.
>
> Now, what about the Founding Fathers of the United
> States?
>
> Something like 98% of the Founding Fathers of the
> United States were MASONS. Their main religious
> affiliation was UNITARIAN. The rest were either
> Catholic or Church of England. If you will look at
> the
> Masonic rolls of Boston (MA), New York (NY),
> Philadelphia (PA), Richmond (VA) and a dozen other
> cities lining the east coast, it reads like a Who's
> Who in American History. Many of the historical
> figures who came to help The Colonies in their break
> from England (e.g. Lafayette from France and Polaski
> from Poland) were also Masons. In fact, many of the
> officers who were fighting on the British side were
> also Masons. Masons, at that time, were DEISTS. A
> deist is one who believes that a God created the
> world
> but that same God doesn't interfere with it. Most
> Christians are theists. A theist sees God
> interfering
> with or can interfere with what's happening in the
> world. (This isn't any different than the Pagans who
> believed that the gods interfered with the lives of
> humans.) In other words, the Founding Fathers of
> this
> country saw that what happens here was up to them.
> It
> wasn't God's will that The Colonies break away from
> England. It wasn't God's will that there be a United
> States of America. Nor was Manifest Destiny God's
> will. It wasn't God's will that the United States
> eventually become a world power.
>
> The Masonic tradition at that time was highly
> steeped
> in OCCULTISM. The Masons were all practicing
> CEREMONIAL MAGICIANS. George Washington, wearing a
> Masonic apron, actually performed a Masonic (occult)
> rite when the cornerstone of the capital was laid
> and
> he placed a box containing Masonic medallions in
> that
> cornerstone. The signing of the Declaration of
> Independence was based on astrological timing worked
> out by one of the Founding Fathers. July 4th, 1776
> at
> 12:00 noon at Philadelphia (PA) was very
> significant.
> That very time is when John Hancock placed his
> signature on the Declaration. They wanted to make
> sure
> that all of the "signs" were propitious for this
> infant country. Would Christians go to this trouble?
> Absolutely NOT! Consequently, the United States was
> founded by occultists based on occult principles.
>
> The Founding Fathers did NOT care for people who
> would
> manipulate The Bible for their own purposes. Their
> disdain for manipulative Christian religious
> philosophies and manipulative preachers is
> well-documented. People like Jerry Fallwell, Billy
> Graham, Oral Roberts, Kenneth Copeland, Gene Scott,
> Jimmy Swaggart, Peter Popov, Benny Hinn, and others
> of
> their ilk would bring out their anger. Read the
> works
> of Thomas Paine ("Common Sense") and Thomas
> Jefferson.
> (Fundamentalists conveniently over-look Jefferson's
> scathing attacks on these kinds of preachers.)
> Jefferson, himself, was so angry with these kinds of
> philosophies and people that he even wrote his own
> version of The Bible. The Bible that George
> Washington
> and many of the presidents took the oath of office
> on
> was, in fact, a Masonic Bible. That Bible is now in
> the Smithsonian.
>
> The Masonic tradition at that time was a powerful
> influence on the world. For centuries just about
> every
> Pope, Cardinal, Bishop, nobleman, the royalty, and
> many generals were Masons. Many important people
> were
> also Masons. Joseph Smith, the founder of the
> Mormons,
> was a Mason, as were many of the Baroque and
> Classical
> composers. Daniel Boone, Davy Crockett, Sam Houston,
> and more than half of the U.S. presidents were
> Masons.
> It was in the middle of the 19th century that THE
> CHURCH condemned the Masonic tradition and said they
> were all a bunch of devil worshippers. After The
> Church's condemnation of the Masonic tradition, the
> manipulative branches of Christianity took up the
> banner (even though they see The Catholic Church as
> in
> league with the devil) because it aided them in
> their
> cause " control of the masses.
>
> Another thing you need to consider is that the
> principles upon which The United States was founded
> upon were, by and large, NOT Christian principles.
> Freedom of religion is definitely not a Christian
> principle. Nor is the right to vote a Christian
> principle. Free education for everyone is also not a
> Christian ideal. Also excluded are freedom of
> speech,
> press, or assembly. But then, slavery was permitted
> by
> Christianity (see Eph. 6:5) and this verse was used
> by, what were, the Southern fundamentalists of the
> time. In essence, the rights of the individual were
> NOT Christian but were Masonic ideals.
>
> It's time that the facts be presented. Most people
> will not take the time to research and find the
> truth.
> Fundamentalists are always going around talking
> about
> The Truth, but when they are confronted by it they
> refuse to accept it. There are two types of
> ignorance:
> The first type of ignorance is that brought about by
> nature where an individual doesn't have the mental
> capacities to seek and/or understand it. The second
> type of ignorance is chosen ignorance. This is the
> byword of fundamentalist Christianity. Through
> half-truths (half-truths are whole lies), purposeful
> semantic manipulations, and feigned knowledge and
> wisdom they "trap(ped) you with gile (lies)" (as
> Paul
> said to the Corinthians). The Truth is out there.
> You
> need to find it for yourself. No one has it for you.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________
> Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail for Mobile
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail
Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/
Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
OM
SPONSORED LINKS
| United state patent | United state army | United state flag |
| United state navy flag | United states patent office | Central intelligence agency |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/
Please let us stay on topic and be civil.
OM
SPONSORED LINKS
| United state patent | United state army | United state flag |
| United state navy flag | United states patent office | Central intelligence agency |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
