Deseret Morning News, Saturday, January 28, 2006 BYU professor's group accuses U.S. officials of lying about 9/11 By Elaine Jarvik Last fall, Brigham Young
University physics professor Steven E. Jones made headlines when he charged that
the World Trade Center collapsed because of "pre-positioned explosives." Now,
along with a group that calls itself "Scholars for 9/11 Truth," he's upping the
ante. "We believe that senior government officials have covered up
crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11," the group says in a statement
released Friday announcing its formation. "We believe these events may have been
orchestrated by the administration in order to manipulate the American people
into supporting policies at home and abroad." Headed by Jones and Jim Fetzer, University of Minnesota Duluth
distinguished McKnight professor of philosophy, the group is made up of 50
academicians and others. They include Robert M. Bowman, former director of the U.S. "Star
Wars" space defense program, and Morgan Reynolds, former chief economist for the
Department of Labor in President George W. Bush's first term. Most of the
members are less well-known. The group's Web site (www.ST911.org) includes an
updated version of Jones's paper about the collapse of the Twin Towers and a
paper by Fetzer that looks at conspiracy theories. The government's version of
the events of 9/11 that the plane's hijackers were tied to Osama bin Laden
is its own conspiracy theory, says Fetzer, who has studied the John F. Kennedy
assassination since 1992. "Did the Bush administration know in advance about the impending
attacks that occurred on 9/11, and allow these to happen, to provoke pre-planned
wars against Afghanistan and Iraq? These questions demand immediate answers,"
charges a paper written collectively by Scholars for 9/11 Truth. The group plans
to write more papers, and present lectures and conferences. "We have very limited resources and no subpoena powers," Fetzer
said. "What you have is a bunch of serious scholars taking a look at this and
discovering it didn't add up. We don't have a political ax to grind." Fetzer has doctorates in the history and philosophy of science.
"One of the roles I can play here," he said, "is to explain why a certain line
of argument is correct or not." In his original message to potential members last month, Fetzer
warned that joining the group might make them the subject of government
surveillance and might get them on various lists of "potential
terrorists." The group's charges include:
Members of the Bush administration knew in advance that the
9/11 attacks would happen but did nothing to stop them.
No Air Force or Air National Guard jets were sent to
"scramble" the hijacked planes, which were clearly deviating from their flight
plans, although jet fighters had been deployed for scramblings 67 times in the
year prior to 9/11. The procedure for issuing orders for scrambling was changed
in June 2001, requiring that approval could only come from the Secretary of
Defense, but Donald Rumsfeld was not alerted soon enough on 9/11, according to
Scholars group.
The video of Osama bin Laden found by American troops in
Afghanistan in December 2001, in which bin Laden says he orchestrated the
attacks, is not bin Laden. The Scholars for 9/11 Truth compared the video with a
photo of the "real" bin Laden and argue that there are discrepancies in the
ratio of nose-length to nose-width, as well as distance from tip-of-nose to ear
lobe. The Scholars group hopes that media outlets around the world
will ask experts in their areas to examine the group's findings and assertions.
If this were done, they argue, "one of the great hoaxes of history would stand
naked before the eyes of the world." The group also asks for an investigation of the collapse of the
World Trade Center buildings, following up on points made in Jones's paper, "Why
Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?" That paper, recently updated, has been
posted on Jones's BYU Web site since last November. Jones argues that the WTC buildings did not collapse due to
impact or fires caused by the jets hitting the towers but collapsed as a result
of pre-positioned "cutter charges." Proof, he says, includes:
Molten metal was found in the subbasements of WTC sites weeks
after 9/11; the melting point of structural steel is 2,750 degrees Fahrenheit
and the temperature of jet fuel does not exceed 1,800 degrees. Molten metal was
also found in the building known as WTC7, although no plane had struck it.
Jones's paper also includes a photo of a slag of the metal being extracted from
ground zero. The slag, Jones argues, could not be aluminum from the planes
because in photographs the metal was salmon-to-yellow-hot temperature
(approximately 1,550 to 1,900 degrees F) "well above the melting temperatures of
lead and aluminum," which would be a liquid at that temperature.
Building WTC7 collapsed in 6.6 seconds, which means, Jones
says, that the steel and concrete support had to be simply knocked out of the
way. "Explosive demolitions are like that," he said. "It doesn't fit the model
of the fire-induced pancake collapse."
No steel-frame, high-rise buildings have ever before or since
been brought down due to fires. Temperatures due to fire don't get hot enough
for buildings to collapse, he says.
Jones points to a recent article in the journal New Civil
Engineering that says WTC disaster investigators at NIST (the National
Institutes of Standards and Technology) "are refusing to show computer
visualizations of the collapse of the Twin Towers despite calls from leading
structural and fire engineers."
Neither Jones nor other members of the Scholars group suggests
who would have planted the explosives, but they argue that the devices could
have been operated by remote control. Jones says he has received thousands of e-mails from people
around the world who either support his ideas or think he's "nutty," and he
still gets about 30 e-mails a day on the topic. He continues to do research on cold fusion, which he prefers to
call metal-catalyzed fusion "to distinguish it from the claims" of former
University of Utah chemistry professors B. Stanley Pons and Martin Fleishmann,
"which we do not accept as verified." He reports that his metal-catalyzed fusion
work is going well, with three scientific papers published last year. Jones will present a talk entitled "9/11 Revisited: Scientific
and Ethical Questions" at Utah Valley State College at 7 p.m. on Wednesday, Feb.
1.
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] © 2006 Deseret News Publishing
Company
Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|