Powdered wigs, a pinch of snuff, and non sequiturs is all you'll ever get from this government.
Blame division and non sequiturs, expert trusted judas goats leading us out into nowhere. Always look a gift trojan horse in the mouth before the lights go out. What is the bottom line, where can this no-win go? If it already looks like it can't go very far, then just for fun, try looking for the non sequiturs and blame division ahead of events. "Fitzgerald found no evidence that Armitage knew of Plame's covert CIA status when he talked to Novak and Woodward" See? A setup, you can't get they-uh from he-uh, another non sequitur no-win setup from the get-go. Just look at their g******ed powdered wigs, bring a dust mask for the snuff, it's bs time. I don't suppose anyone might like to start with Four Generations of Bush All Support Hitler from the 1920's on, so WW2 Ain't Over Yet Til Nuremburg Reigns >From The Lamposts Like GHWB said it ought? No, I thought not, just more bread and circus dead end no-win fox guarding the hencoop powdered wig snuff pinching left hand of Rockefeller committees and commissions and editorials and experts. And what was Fitzgerald's job before? Cover-up for CIA. But you thought he was born again for this Monicagate in a teapot? Maybe, just maybe, not. -Bob --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, RoadsEnd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: "Lloyd Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: August 30, 2006 4:10:48 AM PDT > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], <A- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [A-albionic_Subscription] What Did Fitzgerald Know and > > When Did He Know It? > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ) 2003 Rich Martin > > Permission to repost in full, or in part, is granted. > > In other words, please forward to a friend or list. > > > > If you received this from a friend send email to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > for a free subscription, - > > > > Dear Readers. > > > > You gotta think a bit about this one. Why did the prosecutor indict > > Scooter > > Libby when he knew that Richard Armitage was the perp and there was > > no love > > lost between the 2. Y would Scooter Libby lie to protect Armitage? > > Y would > > Fitzgerald bring a false accusation? Y hasn't Fitzgerald brought > > charges vs > > the real leaker? > > > > Fitzgerald should be prosecuted for abuse of power. Every newspaper > > who > > misreported the story should run a retraction. > > > > They won't so the real qustion to ponder becomes: why won't even > > one of the > > 100's who misrepresented the truth (aka lie), even unintentionally, > > admit > > their error. > > > > The answers to these questions are much more disturbing than one > > crooked > > prosecutor. > > > > Rich Martin > > > > [CPA] What Did Fitzgerald Know and When Did He Know It? > > > > What Did Fitzgerald Know and When Did He Know It? > > Posted by Jason Smith on August 27, 2006 - 22:59. | Jason Smith's blog > > Now we know where Robert Novak learned about Valerie Plame. To the > > Left's > > dismay, it wasn't some mega-whopper conspiracy of historical > > proportions > > aimed at paying back a critic of the administration. .. instead, it > > was just > > a guy who liked Washington gossip, and actually once called Bush, > > Cheney, et > > al. a "bunch of jerks". > > > > > > In the early morning of Oct. 1, 2003, Secretary of State Colin Powell > > received an urgent phone call from his No. 2 at the State Department. > > Richard Armitage was clearly agitated. As recounted in a new book, > > " Hubris: > > The Inside Story of Spin, Scandal, and the Selling of the Iraq War ," > > Armitage had been at home reading the newspaper and had come across > > a column > > by journalist Robert Novak. Months earlier, Novak had caused a huge > > stir > > when he revealed that Valerie Plame, wife of Iraq-war critic Joseph > > Wilson, > > was a CIA officer. Ever since, Washington had been trying to find > > out who > > leaked the information to Novak. The columnist himself had kept > > quiet. But > > now, in a second column, Novak provided a tantalizing clue: his > > primary > > source, he wrote, was a "senior administration official" who was > > "not a > > partisan gunslinger." Armitage was shaken. After reading the > > column, he knew > > immediately who the leaker was. On the phone with Powell that morning, > > Armitage was "in deep distress," > > says a source directly familiar with the conversation who asked not > > to be > > identified because of legal sensitivities. "I'm sure he's talking > > about me." > > > > According to Michael Isikoff, peddling his new book (written with > > liberal > > David Corn) in Newsweek: > > > > Armitage's central role as the primary source on Plame is detailed > > for the > > first time in "Hubris," which recounts the leak case and the inside > > battles > > at the CIA and White House in the run-up to the war. The > > disclosures about > > Armitage, gleaned from interviews with colleagues, friends and lawyers > > directly involved in the case, underscore one of the ironies of the > > Plame > > investigation: that the initial leak, seized on by administration > > critics as > > evidence of how far the White House was willing to go to smear an > > opponent, > > came from a man who had no apparent intention of harming anyone. > > Oops. > > > > Now, here's the big question... what did Prosecutor Patrick > > Fitzgerald know > > and when did he know it? > > > > Armitage's admission led to a flurry of anxious phone calls and > > meetings > > that day at the State Department. (Days earlier, the Justice > > Department had > > launched a criminal investigation into the Plame leak after the CIA > > informed > > officials there that she was an undercover officer.) Within hours, > > William > > Howard Taft IV, the State Department's legal adviser, notified a > > senior > > Justice official that Armitage had information relevant to the > > case. The > > next day, a team of FBI agents and Justice prosecutors > > investigating the > > leak questioned the deputy secretary. Armitage acknowledged that he > > had > > passed along to Novak information contained in a classified State > > Department > > memo: that Wilson's wife worked on weapons-of-mass- destruction > > issues at > > the CIA . (The memo made no reference to her undercover status.) > > Armitage > > had met with Novak in his State Department office on July 8, > > 2003just days > > before Novak published his first piece identifying Plame. Powell, > > Armitage > > and Taft, the only > > three officials at the State Department who knew the story, never > > breathed a > > word of it publicly and Armitage's role remained secret. > > and... > > > > Armitage himself was aggressively investigated by special counsel > > Patrick > > Fitzgerald, but was never charged. Fitzgerald found no evidence that > > Armitage knew of Plame's covert CIA status when he talked to Novak and > > Woodward. > > So, Armitage admitted being the leaker and was promptly > > investigated by the > > Justice Department investigators. .. even "aggresively > > investigated" by > > special counsel Fitzgerald. Within months of Novak's article, > > investigators > > knew exactly who had leaked... and had "found no evidence" that an > > "outing" > > was intentional. > > > > So the big question now is why did Fitzgerald continue his > > investigation for > > another two years until he was able to indict an administration > > official for > > a bad memory? > > > > Maybe another investigation should be launched... > > > > > > > > Put on your ears and hear it from John's lips. > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fs7qIQ1VkEg&search=lawsuit > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding. > > Make My Way your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com > > > > > > To comment or read what others are saying about the content of this > > list, > > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with the following command in the BODY of your email > > message: subscribe Slick-R > > or send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -\- > > - To join/quit this list, > > send a blank email to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
