Privacy and surveillance
Observatory on data protection in the EU
- the protection of personal data in police and judicial matters
- full-text documentation on all the secret discussions in the Council


Introduction

The EU is currently discussing a draft Framework Decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters.

The European Commission produced a draft proposal on 4 October 2005. The European Parliament finally adopted its report on 27 September - a "partial vote" in July voted through all 60 amendments agreed by the Committee on Civil Liberties (LIBE). On this issue the parliament is only "consulted" - which means that its views can be disregarded by the Council of the European Union (the 25 EU governments).

The Council has taken months looking at the Commission proposal and have changed it substantially in favour of "self-regulation" by the agencies and removing the rights of data subjects to information held on them and the possibility to correct it.

The proposal is being discussed in the Council by the Multidisciplinary Group on Organised Crime (MDG) whose primary interest is to ensure the greatest possible powers to exchange any and all data between all agencies - at the national, European and international levels - with the fewest possible obstacles created by data protection rights.

Lord Avebury (UK House of Lords Select Committee on the EU) will put it to the European Parliament on 3 October 2006 in the following terms, the MDG's: "primary interest is to make life difficult for criminals, not to have regard to the interests of data subjects" [The full-text of Lord Avebury's speech to the EP on data protection and the principle of availability (pdf)]

Peter Hustinx, the European Data Protection Supervisor, expressed similar concerns to the UK House of Lords Select Committee on the EU inquiry (Behind Closed Doors, see below), discussions he said were progressing very slowly, partly because: "national delegations tend to come from law enforcement areas which, up to now, largely prefer to ignore data protection”.

The legitimacy of the decision-making process is also of concern on such an important issue. The European Parliament only has powers of "consultation" nevertheless it adopted a report with 60 amendments to strengthen the Commission's proposal - a final vote was delayed from July until September in the hope that the incoming Finnish Council Presidency would be "willing to take into account Parliament's demands", there is little evidence that it has done so. If the final version agreed within the Council is substantially different from that put forward by the Commission the parliament can insist that it is consulted again - unless it does there will be no time at all for a debate in parliaments and outside.

Tony Bunyan, Statewatch editor, comments:

"This is going to be a momentous decision affecting existing national laws on data protection, and the exchange of data within the EU and around the globe. It is also going to the the foundation of the right of data protection in a host of planned and future EU measures, including the new Schengen Information System (SIS II).

The Commission draft proposal is being substantially re-written by the Council's Multidisciplinary Group on Organised Crime including removing the rights of data subjects and obstacles to the passing of data to third countries outside the EU.

Until the Council finishes its so-called "second reading" the final text will not been known - when they are intending to simply "nod" it through. If it does so without the opportunity for national and European parliaments and civil society to express their views it will utterly lack legitimacy"

Key documents (latest first)


Council of the European Union

- 13246/1/06 REV1, 9 October 2006. It will be seen in the introduction (p2, pt 4) that the draft "departs from the point of view that the FD will also be applicable to domestic data processing"

- 13246/06, dated 27 September 2006. Full-text of the Council's current draft. First six pages set out issues for the Multidisciplinary Group on Organised Crime to discuss as the Council starts its "second reading"

- 12294/06, dated 19 September 2006 - "Issues paper"

- 12432/06 - Questions on scope, 6 September 2006

- 11547/3/06 Full-text of the Council's draft at 13 September 2006

"At the meetings of the MDG - Mixed Committee of 8 February, 9 and 31 March, 25 April and 19 May 2006 the first two chapters were discussed in-depth. At the meetings of 20 June, 7 and 25 July 2006, Chapter III was discussed. At the meeting of 4 September 2006, Chapters IV and V were discussed. Delegations are invited to discuss of Chapters VI, VII and VIII."

- 11547/2/06 Full-text of the Council's draft at 24 August 2006

- 11547/06 Full-text of the Council's draft at 13 July 2006

- 8175/2/06 - Information on state of play of discussions, 25 April 2006

- 8175/1/06 - Information on state of play of discussions, 24 April 2006

- 8175/06 Scope: application to processing of data in a purely domestic context, 6 April 2006

- 6450/5/06 Full-text of the Council's draft at 23 June 2006

- 6450/4/06 Full-text of the Council's draft at 7 July 2006

- 6450/3/06 Full-text of the Council's draft at 11 May 2006

"At the meetings of the MDG - Mixed Committee of 8 February, 9 and 31 March, 25 April and 19 May 2006 the first two chapters were discussed in-depth. Further to those discussions the Presidency has amended the text of the relevant provisions of Chapter II, which has a pivotal position in the draft Framework Decision." (emphasis added)

- 6450/2/06 Full-text of the Council's draft at 19 April 2006

- 6450/1/06 Full-text of the Council's draft at 23 March 2006

- 6450/06 Full-text of the Council's draft at 28 February 2006

- 5485/06 Discussion of issues, 23 January 2006

- 5193/06 Changes to the preamble ("Recitals"), 11 January 2006

- 15554/05 Discussion of issues: 21 December 2005

- 14326/05 Discussion of issues: 15 November 2005

The final report issued by the Council's Information Systems and Data Protection Working Party in April 2001 (it met between 1998-2001) - the Working Party was formally abolished in 2002:

- Draft Resolution on the personal data protection rules in instruments under the third pillar of the European Union (6316/2/01)

European Parliament

1. Report formally adopted on 27 September 2007

2. Report dated 18 May 2006

European Commission

1. Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters COM(2005) 475 final, 4.10.05

2. Commission Staff working document: SEC(2005) 1241: Annex to the: Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial co-operation in criminal matters IMPACT ASSESSMENT

European Data Protection Supervisor

1. Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the protection of personal data processed in the framework of police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters (COM (2005) 475 final) 19 December 2005

Opinion of European data protection authorities

1. Conference of European Data Protection Authorities, Brussels, 24 January 2006

2. Declaration adopted at the Conference of European Data Protection Authorities in Budapest from 24 to 25 April 2006

National parliaments

UK: House of Commons: The Select Committee on European Scrutiny has so far discussed the measure on three occasions: 27 July 2006 (link), 11 January 2006 (link) and 16 November 2005 (link)

UK: House of Lords: Select Committee on the European Union: Its report "Behind Closed Doors" covers the proposed Framework Decision and includes evidence from the European Data Protection Supervisor: Behind Closed Doors (pdf)

Civil society reactions

1. Statewatch analysis (forthcoming, Thursday 5 October 2006)

1995 Directive on data protection

1. Directive 95/46/ECon the protection and processing of personal data ("first pillar", including immigration)
2. First, and only report, produced by the Commission on the implementaion of 95/46/EC, 15.5.03.
2a. Extract from above report on the major shortcomings of resources and compliance

3. Technical annexe to Commission report on implementation above
4. Letter from the USA to the EU Article 29 working party on data protection concerning the implementation report, xx August 2002
5. EU policy “putsch”: Data protection handed to the DG for “law, order and security”

The 18-page analysis is on: http://www.statewatch.org/news/2006/oct/eu-dp.pdf

this is backed up by full-text documentation on Statewatch's Observatory on data protection in the EU: http://www.statewatch.org/eu-dp.htm

~~~

Analysis: Biometrics and surveillance by Tony Bunyan, Statewatch editor:
http://www.statewatch.org/news/2006/sep/democracy-and-technology.pdf

“This Commission initiative is entirely directed at the “needs” of the agencies not the “needs” of the people. It presumes that multinationals and state agencies can be trusted to know what is best for us. The quality of democratic life is too important to be decided by multinationals and the law enforcement and security agencies”

 

__._,_.___

Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/

Please let us stay on topic and be civil.

OM





SPONSORED LINKS
Independent broker dealer Independent director Central intelligence agency
Central intelligence agency employment

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Reply via email to