The concept of a shaped charge is what is being proffered. An inverted cone of metal jacketed high explosive that hits armor creates a molten stream of metal that burns through the armor plate. If Loftus wants to say a commercial jet hitting a building behaves like an RPG7 hitting a humvee, then I would think that we are now seeing the next phase in the 911 cover up. I lump this right in there with Mike Ruppert telling us to forget about 911. geez!
--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, RoadsEnd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Basically, my understanding of what Loftus is talking about is what > happens when a large object moving at a high rate of speed hits an > immovable object creating high temperatures and thusly > disintegration. What form this disintegration took and if this > activity created any special effect I do not know. > > Peace, > K > > On Sep 17, 2007, at 2:09 PM, mark urban wrote: > > > It is amazing how the laws of physics just went all to hell on 911. > > > > > > > > > > --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "Vigilius Haufniensis" > > <thehatefulnerd@> wrote: > >> > >> john loftus is on wtprn right now claiming that "the pentagon > > plane" turned into plasmic matter. as i understand it, plasmic > > matter is the fourth phase of matter. solid, liquid, gas, plasma. > > like in the sun. the sun is "plasmic matter." he's saying that the > > plane "vaporized into plasma" and that's why the damage to the > > pentagon went so deep, because of the "focused energy." > >> the plane "vaporized into plasma" because that one wall had been > > armored. > >> he's saying that this is not inconsistent with finding human > > remains. > >> of course, none of this addresses the question as to whether the > > plane was hijacked, radio controlled, switched out with a drill, > > etc. could a missile be "vaporized into plasma?" according to > > loftus, the military HAS weapons that do precisely this. he was > > stating this as proof that the "plasmic effect" could be possible. > > heh. > >> to me, its all just begging the question. for instance, why did > > the plane fly over the pentagon, do a 180, come all the way back > > around, and hit THAT side? and what about the alleged explosions > > before the pentagon strike? > >> now theyre talking about security cams. > >> www.wtprn.com > >> 9:15 pm central time > >> > > > > > > > > > > Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ > > > > Please let us stay on topic and be civil. > > > > OM > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
