I'm not even going to provide a link to a Washington Post story on human trafficking.
Remember the Seattle APEC conference story, where the only thing wrong with FBI using CIA-kidnapped children to make pedo-porn was selling the video equipment afterward? Wouldn't that entail human trafficking? Doesn't that put a different spin on the Lindbergh kidnapping? Isn't that pretty far downstream of J. Edgar Hoover's "there is no mafia"? Obviously if the FBI is a kidnapping agency now, reducing human trafficking is pretty low on their list of priorities, and the same could be said of a news media that only found corruption in the selling of pedo-porn recording equipment. What if the FBI agents sold the children after the videos were made? Would that be good or bad? I guess that would be slightly corrupt in a limited hangout sort of space filler way with no follow up story there either.
