ACL's Non-Fiction Studies of Communitarianism by Niki Raapana Communitarianism is the foundation for the emerging supranational government. This is not a conspiracy theory. Anyone who says it is shouldn't be trusted as a source. Everything we write about communitarianism at this website can be verified. There are 10,000 exit links here; most will take you directly to goverment agencies, mainstream news and academic sources. The Communitarian Network is not a secret society. They have a website at George Washington University. They've published thousands of books and articles describing their efforts and plans. They have a Platform with a list of endorsers. You could go sign it right now if you want to.
The modern version of this ancient religious and legal theory was introduced in upper academia in the late 1980s. It had brief international attention as the Clinton-Blair Third Way. (Barak Obama is the leading Third Way candidate; Senator Evan Bayh leads the Third Way group in the U.S. Senate. John McCain, like President Bush, supports all communitarian programs and policies.) In August of 2008, the National Association of Scholars (NAS) began an initiative to study communitarianism. Presented in a four part series, the ACL is included in Thomas Wood's bibliography: http://www.nas.org/postings/how_many_delawares/communitarian-bibliographyhtm. Global community governance and sustainablity are based in the theory of communitarianism. Communitarians believe that communities should hold the same rights as are held by individuals in the USA. It's billed as a spiritual, earth friendly solution to every conflict between polar opposites. It officially solves the traditional right v left divide. Capitalism, communism and socialism can now merge into the next level of planned human social evolution. The bureaucratic structure for governing the world is a massive project with thousands of groups participating. As Thomas Wood explains: "It is important to consider the whole range of issues that 'sustainability' covers. Since enlisting as the principal researcher and investigator for the NAS's 'How Many Delawares?' project, I have been frequently struck, even bewildered, by the multitude of topics 'sustainability' is supposed to cover. Below is a selection. Since they are so numerous, I have categorized them as follows: GENERAL TERMS, DOMESTIC POLITICS/IDEOLOGY, INTERNATIONAL POLITICS, LAW, ECONOMICS, ECOLOGY, DIVERSITY & IDENTITY POLITICS, and ACADEMICS:" What is the ultimate goal of communitarianism? Their stated goal is to bring all nations under one supreme system of justice. In Europe the emerging system is openly defined by Supremacy of Communitarian Law. The Communitarian guru assigned to the U.S. is Dr. Amitai Etzioni. He describes his job as a global architect. His mandate is to help rebuild our nation, any way he can. In some places communitarians create change by carrying out lethal, frontal assaults with guns, tanks and even weapons of mass destruction. In other lands they follow Etzioni's Fabian ideology, using propaganda and lies to foment evolutionary change. Fabians teach a slow, quiet infiltration of governments via "expert" advice, lobbying, misleading legislation, public mis-education, grants, and faith-based, quasi-religious persuasions. No matter where they go or how they do it, communitarians identify the same national problems and suggest the same supra-national solutions. They want us to believe they are the saviors of this beautiful earth we all call home. Active globally since 1847, communitarians have purposefully helped to shape the world as we see it today. Their theory includes Hegel's Idea that war is the best way to reshape a more perfect world. It was under communitarian spiritual guidance that many modern societies evolved into their present state of blissful chaos. Who actually believes in this? We find communitarians in academia, government, think-tanks, non-profits, movements (peace, eco-green, nationalist, racist, et. al.), spy rings, secret societies, churches, temples, courtrooms, covert datagathering, revolutions (of every variety), wars (including wars on behaviors, regulating drugs, cigarettes, alcohol, obesity, all "unsustainable" lifesyles). Linked directly to political assassinations and free trade negotitations, there's no borders for this army. Nothing hinders their ability to infiltrate any established group. They operate in the U.S. with impunity. Americans missed it somehwere along the way, but there are many openly communitarian politicians (Gorbachev, Strong, Blair, Schroeder, Bush II, Clintons, Obama, and Bayh, et.al.). This theory of community government crosses political lines. Republicans should know that Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin helped establish invasive, aggressive Community Policing in rural Alaska. Once mayor, she brought in millions of communitarian redevelopment grants. But now that Obama won the popular vote, Americans should start hearing more about it. Etzioni predicted Barack Obama would start explaining his communitarian values if he were elected: "Brooks contrasts Obama with McCain, noting that "while Obama seeks solidarity with groups, McCain resists conformity. He fights fiercely, though not always successfully, against political pressures in order to remain honest, brave and forthright." In short, McCain is an individualist. "The elections are a year away. There are going to be many twists and turns, but in the end the American people will choose a communitarian - unless a third party candidate siphons off many Democratic votes, the Supreme Court denies voting rights to many who are poor, less educated, and from a minority background (and hence have no government issued photo ID), Americans are swayed by the thousands of troops coming hope from Iraq (as Bush draws down the surge), the economy picks up and global climate cools down. That is, communitarians should not uncork the champagne quite yet, but they can safely put a bottle or two into the fridge. At least many more people will learn a lot more about communitarian ideas - what more can we ask for?" (Amitai Etzioni, a University Professor at George Washington University and the author of From Empire to Community and The New Golden Rule) Why and how are they doing this? Communitarians are convinced independent nations are no longer necessary. They preach changes in the U.S. Bill of Rights (and sometimes they cleverly change the meanings of the words used to write it). They insist all current national political systems must be adapted to comply with supreme global law. Besides the numerous new laws implemented under sustainable development and environmental protections, new constitutions must be written that change every nation into a regional global community. If a communitarian constitution will not pass with the national voters in the "free" countries, free trade agreements may be substituted if they accomplish the same regionalization goals. For an inside glimpse into their tactics, do a search for what happened after the Irish voters rejected the Lisbon Treaty. Read what the globalists say they have to do next. No matter what you believe in, the communitarians consider their ideas and actions more moral than yours. Not one individual nor any nation on earth is as morally superior as they are. Unless you support communitarian values, you are inferior. Individuals like us have no natural right to control our own destiny. According to communitarians, unalienable (birth) rights is a false premise that has been proven wrong. The American's idea of laws that protect individuals and their markets cannot remain in any part of the collective human consciousness. "The old ideologies positioned politics as a struggle for ownership, the historic battle between socialism and capitalism. The Third Way, by contrast, sees politics as an exercise in communitarianism: rebuilding the relationships and social capital between people. It aims to put the social back into social justice. This is an important strategy for combating individualism and generating a sense of collective responsibility in society. " (Australian Fabian Society, Re-inventing Collectivism: The new Social Democracy by Mark Latham, Member for Werriwa Third Way Conference, Centre for Applied Economic Research, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 12 July 2001) Our purpose at this website This website exposes the entire communitarian agenda as a fraud against all free people. Our mission states our position. Are we a "credible" source? You be the judge of the accuracy of our work. Take a few exit links and read what they say. Some of our sources go to a 404 error after all these years, the internet does change faces continually, but most are still functional. Start by reading the Communitarian bibliography posted at the Communitarian Network. There's plenty of evidence communitarianism is real. If Etzioni's lofty communitarian theory could be defended against our ACL manifesto, don't you know his staff would have made mincemeat of our thesis in 2003 when they first studied it. In 2008 the ACL manifesto and my blog were included in a sociology class at Vassar College, as part of a Quality of Life seminar. Over 4000 visitors have answered our poll asking why they went looking for the Hegelian dialectic. We've had thousands of readers from every university in the world. We've contacted hundreds of law schools and communitarian professors and asked them to review our thesis. Not one scholar in the world has sent us a rebuttal to our thesis. Disclaimer Links from this website are not an endorsement of either the source or the content. We've had to cover a multitude of subjects in our ten year course of study; some of our sources exist outside the controlled "debates." I am an Alaskan state citizen therefore this website (and all its contents) is protected under 3 clauses in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: Freedom of Speech, the Press and Redress of Grievances. We include every topic the communitarian thinkers use in their academic arguments against our freedom. As Americans, we live under the pretext that ours is a political system that guarantees our individual right to study whatever historical accounts we choose, to hold an opinion contrasting that of the majority, and to voice our unhappiness with government officials who violate their constitutional parameters. "Question: Is linking protected by the First Amendment? "Answer: The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says that "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble..." The government (and states, under the Fourteenth Amendment) must meet a high level of scrutiny before restricting speech. "A hyperlinks refers to and describes the location of another Internet resource. The text of the hyperlink and the material linked to may be highly expressive. In addition, the act of linking to other websites may be likened to protected "assembly," or association with those sites." http://www.chillingeffects.org/linking/faq.cgi We don't include the alien theories or religious arguments in our main thesis. Our focus is on Etzioni's current communitarian programs and policy agenda. That doesn't mean we've shied away from the lie they tell about their more obscured history; there is a darker side to these communitarian fiends. Hard to ignore the spirituality of a group whose members published the Luciferian news. The communitarians are linked directly to some of the most ritualistic, violent movements in the world, and some of the things that happen to people in their wars and disasters is beyond disgusting. I didn't devote a lot of time researching the child pornography/kidnapping and prostitution slave rings and brainwashing programs, but it's not hard to find out about their depravity from accounts published in the respected press. As for the conspiracy theory label, I spent a lot of time studying the term and it's used more and more often to discredit anyone asking questions the rulers' followers do not want to answer. The entire American public arena is controlled by the communitarians. The proof is in the fact that so few Americans have ever heard the term used while all the upper level academics and White house advisers use it on a regular basis. Their opinions are the only ones allowed to be taught in our schools and colleges and their ideals and visions require your mandatory support and volunteer committment. There can be no consciencious objections to serving in the Armies of Compassion. "Expand Corporation for National and Community Service: Obama and Biden will expand AmeriCorps from 75,000 slots today to 250,000 and they will focus this expansion on addressing the great challenges facing the nation. They will establish a Classroom Corps to help teachers and students, with a priority placed on underserved schools; a Health Corps to improve public health outreach; a Clean Energy Corps to conduct weatherization and renewable energy projects; a Veterans Corps to assist veterans at hospitals, nursing homes and homeless shelters; and a Homeland Security Corps to help communities plan, prepare for and respond to emergencies." http://www.barackobama.com/issues/service/ But, just because a site is listed on the Conspiracy Theory page, it doesn't mean that we don't include these same sites elsewhere at this site. Many readers will find (like I did) that some conspiracy theorists' information can be validated and is a pertinent contribution to understanding supranational integration. We stand by what we said in our conclusion to What is the Hegelian dialectic? in 2002: "The communitarian synthesis is the final silent move in a well-designed, quietly implemented plot to re-make the world into colonies. To us it doesn't matter if there is some form of ancient religion that propels the plotters, nor does it really matter if it turns out they're aliens (as some suggest). "The bottom line is the Hegelian dialectic sets up the scene for state intervention, confiscation, and redistribution in the United States. Communitarian development plans are functioning in every corner of the the world, and there is no legal avenue to withdraw from them. " We're still looking for ways to exist outside the dialectic, even though we never got our "withdrawl" papers. It is impossible to live without being part of it, as we are all directly affected by one or more of the various manifestations of the synthesis' programs and policies. After almost ten years of studying them we'd like to rebuild our lives before we rebuild this website. More recently we've moved our focus toward building a network of local fishermen, hunters, trappers, mechanics, craftspeople, pickers, herbalists, growers, herders, carpenters, inventors, designers, architects, welders, spinners, and the like, who are interested in trading goods and knowledge. http://nord.twu.net/acl/nonfictionstudies.html Living Outside the Dialectic http://nikiraapana.blogspot.com/
