> 
> Subject: SOUND CANNON IN PGH. USED ON PROTESTERS
> 

> http://www.opednews.com/populum/link.php?id=98268
> Police Use Painful New Weapon on G20 Protesters
>  
> By Allison Kilkenny, True/Slant
Posted on September 28, 2009, Printed on
> September 28, 2009
http://www.alternet.org/story/142921/
> Pittsburgh police demonstrated the latest in crowd control techniques on
> protesters when they used "sound cannons" to blast the ears of citizens near
> the G-20 meeting of world economic leaders. City officials said this was the
> first time such sound blasters, also known as "sound weapons," were used
> publicly.
> Lavonnie Bickerstaff of the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police uses benign language
> like "sound amplifiers," and "long-range acoustic device" to explain the new
> weapons in an attempt to sanitize what is essentially a painful weapon that
> leaves no visible marks on its victims. The mob utilized a similar tactic on
> snitches when they would beat everywhere except the face. If victims have no
> outward bruises to show, the world is less likely to believe their stories of
> assault and harassment.
> Unlike aerosol hand-grenades, pepper spray, and rubber bullets (all
> traditional methods of protest suppression also used at the G-20 protests,)
> the damage from sound cannons is entirely internal, and can only be preserved
> on video, but even then, the deafening noise cannot be fully appreciated
> unless one hears it in person.
> (Footage of the sound cannons in action can be seen/heard below. It¹s clear
> from these videos that the extremely loud, high-pitched noise causes pain.)
> The "long range acoustic device (LRAD)" is designed for long-range
> communication and acts as an "unmistakable warning," according to the American
> Technology Corporation (ATC,) which develops the instruments. "The LRAD
> basically is the ability to communicate clearly from 300 meters to 3
> kilometers" (nearly 2 miles), said Robert Putnam of American Technology¹s
> media and investor relations during an interview with MSNBC. "It¹s a focused
> output. What distinguishes it from other communications tools out there is its
> ability to be heard clearly and intelligibly at a distance, unlike bullhorns."
> Except, police aren¹t trying to send a distress call to allies 2 miles away.
> They¹re literally blasting this extreme decibel of noise directly into the
> ears of protesters (or any unwitting citizens) standing mere feet from the
> cannons. Depending on the mode of LRAD, it can blast a maximum sound of 145 to
> 151 decibels ‹ equal to a gunshot ‹ within a 3-foot (one meter) range,
> according to ATC. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) reports that
> permanent hearing loss can result from sounds at about 110 to 120 decibels in
> short bursts or even just 75 decibels if exposure lasts for long periods.
> But there is a volume knob, Putnam notes, so its output can be less than max,
> purportedly to give us comfort in the knowledge that deafening citizens is
> left to the discretion of power-hungry police. On the decibel scale, an
> increase of 10 (say, from 70 to 80) means that a sound is 10 times more
> intense. Normal traffic noise can reach 85 decibels, reports MSNBC, but these
> sound cannons cannot be compared to standing beside a busy New York City road.
> The BBC reported in 2005 that the "shrill sound of an LRAD at its loudest
> sounds something like a domestic smoke alarm, ATC says, but at 150 decibels,
> it is the aural equivalent to standing 30m away from a roaring jet engine and
> can cause major hearing damage if misused."
> This technology has been deployed in Iraq as an "anti-insurgent weapon," and
> the sonic weaponry is also being used on protesters in Honduras. Seattle
> Weekly reports that this weapon could easily be used as a torture tool if one
> doesn¹t already think this is its only use.
> Sonic weaponry is now being deployed domestically to put a chill on free
> speech. We¹re told this is the "humane" way to deal with protesters, but it¹s
> really just a convenient way to suppress citizens without the messy
> aftereffects of having to explain bullet holes to reporters. A bunch of
> protesters complaining about ruptured ear drums doesn¹t make for dramatic
> news.
> Footage of the sound cannons in action:
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> © 2009 True/Slant All rights reserved.
View this story online at:
> http://www.alternet.org/story/142921/
> 

------ End of Forwarded Message

Reply via email to