It has been admitted that real nuclear attack is becoming more probable than ever before. During most of the Cold War there were secret agreements. Most 'terrorists' are major intel groups concocted. 'Rogue states' would be dumped on in a heartbeat if they even thought of a nuke. But real terrorists who would be 1- smart enough not to identify with any particular state, 2- would obtain the uranium themselves not try to buy on black market (most common tool is the jackhammer and can be disguised in simple projects like roads or bridge work, 3- the 'hard-to-process' bull is just for the public i.e. a centrifuge is a centrifuge. Here: http://www.midcoast.com/~michael1/webnukeletter.htm Notice as per first paragraph that Adm. Keeting called off terrorist nuke exercise shortly after the letter (as it was posted on Rumor Mill News) had 14,000 readers within a few days. Why? He was giving away too much. My understanding is that there was a 'terrorist nuke exercise' eventually held but 99% under cover.
> Atomic Obsession > video 09.11.11: > http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/id/216291 > > John Mueller argues that our decades-long fear of a nuclear attack has > been > unwarranted and that the likelihood of a terrorist obtaining a nuclear > device and using it against the U.S. is far smaller than most people > think. > Professor Mueller took up these topics in his latest book, Atomic > Obsession. > He spoke about the book at the University of Missouri in St. Louis. > >
