Below is present Dolphin problem in general:

Dolphins used in 2nd Iraq invasion because in prior war game General Van
Riper played the enemy and sunk most of the US fleet in the Persian Gulf.
http://www.newshounds.us/2006/04/24/8th_retired_general_comes_out_against_rumsfeld.php
 and
http://articles.sfgate.com/2003-03-20/news/17483558_1_littoral-combat-ship-pearl-harbor-cruise

One of the number of precautions:  U.S. Dolphins were used, more than one
“platoon” of them, (7 dolphins to a platoon).  The skipper of the USS
Gunsten Hall volunteered his ship.  However the navy hand to keep flying
in more and more animal trainers as right away a giant Dolphin boredom
problem developed.


> Today the US military keeps dolphins for suchs purposes.
>
> http://information.usnavyseals.com/2009/12/the-history-of-dolphins-in-us-navy-history.html
>
> Ole
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Akif / Chulo / El Ecologista / The Green Wrangler
>   To: cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com
>   Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 6:07 AM
>   Subject: [cia-drugs] ANTI - TANK DOGS !
>
>
>
>   Anti-tank dogs, also known as dog bombs or dog mines, were hungry dogs
> with
>   explosives harnessed to their backs and trained to seek food under tanks
> and
>   armoured vehicles.
>
>   By doing so, a detonator (usually a small wooden lever) would go off,
> triggering
>   the explosives and damaging or destroying the military vehicle.
>
>   The dogs were employed by the Soviet Union during World War II for use
> against
>   German tanks. The dogs were kept without food for a few days, then
> trained to
>   find food under a tank.
>
>   The dogs quickly learned that once released from their pens, food could
> be found
>   under tracked vehicles. Once trained, the dogs were fitted with an
> explosive
>   charge and set loose into a field of oncoming German tanks and other
> tracked
>   vehicles.
>
>   When the dog went underneath the tank-where there was less armour-the
> charge
>   would detonate and damage the enemy vehicle.
>
>   According to Soviet sources, the anti-tank dogs were successful at
> disabling a
>   reported three hundred German tanks. They were enough of a problem to
> the Nazi
>   advance that the Germans were compelled to take measures against them.
>
>   An armoured vehicle's top-mounted machine gun proved ineffective due to
> the
>   relatively small size of the dogs and the fact that they were low to the
> ground,
>   fast, and hard to spot. Orders were dispatched that commanded every
> German
>   soldier to shoot any dogs on sight. Eventually the Germans began using
>   tank-mounted flame-throwers to ward off the dogs. They were much more
> successful
>   at dissuading the attacks, but some dogs would not stop.
>
>   In 1942, one use of the anti-tank dogs went seriously awry when a large
>   contingent ran amok, endangering everyone in the battle and forcing the
> retreat
>   of an entire Soviet division.
>
>   Soon afterward the anti-tank dogs were withdrawn from service. Training
> of
>   anti-tank dogs continued until at least June 1996.
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to