------ Forwarded Message
> From: "dasg...@aol.com" <dasg...@aol.com>
> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 02:58:55 EST
> To: Robert Millegan <ramille...@aol.com>
> Cc: <ema...@aol.com>, <j...@aol.com>, <jim6...@cwnet.com>,
> <christian.r...@gmail.com>
> Subject: What Do You Call a Wall Street CEO in San Quentin?  A Good Start.
> 

> Findings on Lehman
> Take Even Experts by Surprise
> By MICHAEL J. de la MERCED
> <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/d/michael_j_de_la_
> merced/index.html?inline=nyt-per>
> New York Times: March 12, 2010
> http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/13/business/13lehman.html
>  
>  
> <javascript:pop_me_up2('http://www.nytimes.com/imagepages/2010/03/13/business/
> 13lehman_CA0.html','13lehman_CA0_html','width=570,height=600,scrollbars=yes,to
> olbars=no,resizable=yes')>
> Richard Fuld, former chief executive of Lehman, testifying on Capitol Hill in
> October 2008. 
>  
> <http://www.nytimes.com/adx/bin/adx_click.html?type=goto&opzn&page=www.nytimes
> .com/yr/mo/day/business&pos=Frame4A&sn2=a23bc051/6ffe8c2e&sn1=c488950/af17707f
> &camp=foxsearch2010_emailtools_1225564c_nyt5&ad=OFW_120x60_d_03.12&goto=http%3
> A%2F%2Fwww%2Efoxsearchlight%2Ecom%2Fourfamilywedding>
> For the year that it took the court-appointed examiner to complete his report
> on the demise of Lehman Brothers
> <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/lehman_brothers_holding
> s_inc/index.html?inline=nyt-org> , officials from Wall Street to Washington
> were anticipating it as the definitive account of the largest bankruptcy in
> American history.
>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> In Lehman¹s Demise, Some Shades of  Enron
>>> <http://dealbook.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/12/in-lehmans-demise-some-shades-
>>> of-enron/?ref=business>
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> 
>>> White Collar Watch finds Lehman Brothers¹  accounting gimmicks are eerily
>>> reminiscent of those used by  Enron, and it anticipates that the government
>>> will pursue civil  charges, at the least, for securities fraud.
> 
> And the report did just that when it was unveiled on Thursday, riveting
> readers with the exhaustive detail contained in its nine volumes and 2,200
> pages. Yet almost immediately, it raised a host of new questions.
> 
> Now government regulators have what some lawyers call a road map for further
> inquiry into former Lehman executives like Richard S. Fuld Jr.
> <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/f/richard_s_fuld_j
> r/index.html?inline=nyt-per>  and the auditing firm Ernst & Young.
> 
> Whether the Justice Department and the Securities and Exchange Commission
> <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/s/securitie
> s_and_exchange_commission/index.html?inline=nyt-org>  will actually pursue
> their own legal actions is unclear. But legal experts said on Friday that the
> examiner, Anton R. Valukas, had provided plenty of material for civil
> regulatory action at the least with his findings of ³materially misleading²
> accounting and ³actionable balance sheet manipulation.²
> 
> ³It¹s certainly not helpful to any of them,² Michael J. Missal, a partner at
> the law firm K&L Gates and the examiner in the bankruptcy case of New Century
> Financial, said of some individuals accused of impropriety in the report. ³It
> certainly assists private litigants and probably increases the pressure on the
> government to take some kind of action here.²
> 
> Representatives for the S.E.C. and the United States attorneys
> <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/u/united_states_
> attorneys/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>  offices in Manhattan and Brooklyn
> declined to comment.
> 
> While Mr. Fuld and other former top Lehman officials are already defendants in
> a number of civil lawsuits, the new discoveries by Mr. Valukas have taken even
> veteran observers by surprise. Chief among these was the revelation of a
> particularly aggressive accounting practice, known internally as Repo 105,
> that Mr. Valukas said helped the investment bank mask the true depths of its
> financial woes. 
> 
> Examiners in bankruptcy cases are appointed by the Justice Department to
> investigate accusations of wrongdoing or misconduct. Their job is to determine
> whether creditors can recover more money in these cases, and their findings
> often serve as guides for more lawsuits and even regulatory action.  What
> examiners are not asked to do is play judge and jury.
> 
> Though the report contains strong language ‹ Mr. Valukas deems Mr. Fuld ³at
> least grossly negligent² in his role overseeing Lehman ‹ it stops short of
> accusing anyone of criminal conduct or of violating securities law.
> 
> Patricia Hynes, a lawyer for Mr. Fuld, said on Thursday that her client ³did
> not know what those transactions were ‹ he didn¹t structure or negotiate them,
> nor was he aware of their accounting treatment.² She did not return an e-mail
> seeking additional comment on Friday.
> 
> Mr. Valukas¹s findings have stirred loud discussion among legal and accounting
> experts over the ways Lehman sought to improve its quarterly results months
> before it collapsed.
> 
> Over hundreds of pages, Mr. Valukas details the genesis of and the process
> behind Repo 105. Based on standard repurchase agreements ‹ short-term loans
> commonly used by many firms for daily financing needs, in which borrowers
> temporarily exchange assets in return for cash up front ‹ Lehman took a
> particularly aggressive accounting approach to these transactions.
> 
> Here, the investment bank used repos to temporarily park assets off its books
> to make its end-of-quarter debt levels look better than they did ‹ while
> calling them sales instead of loans.
> 
> The accounting tactic, first used by Lehman in 2001, had one catch, according
> to Mr. Valukas: no American law firm would sign off on its use.
> 
> Enter Linklaters, a highly respected British law firm that gave Lehman the
> answer it wanted. So long as the repos were conducted in London through the
> bank¹s European arm, and so long as the company took other cosmetic steps to
> make these transactions appear to be sales instead of financings, Linklaters
> determined that they would pass regulatory muster.
> 
> A spokeswoman for Linklaters said on Friday that the firm was not contacted by
> Mr. Valukas and that its legal opinions were not criticized in the examiner¹s
> report as wrong or improper.
> 
> Lehman also had the backing of Ernst & Young, which certified the bank¹s
> financial statements despite receiving warnings from a whistle-blower who said
> there were accounting improprieties. An Ernst & Young spokesman said on
> Thursday that the firm stood by its work for 2007, the last year it conducted
> an audit of Lehman¹s financial results.
> 
> But Lynn E. Turner, a former chief accountant for the S.E.C., accused Ernst &
> Young of abdicating its responsibility to the audit committee of Lehman¹s
> board by not presenting the concerns.
> 
> ³This is pretty aggressive and pretty abusive. I don¹t know how under GAAP
> this follows the rules whatsoever,² he said, referring to Generally Accepted
> Accounting Principles.
> 
> ³That reeks of an auditor who, rather than being really truly independent, is
> beholden to management,² he said, adding that the S.E.C. and the Justice
> Department should follow up on Mr. Valukas¹s findings.
> 
> Executives at other Wall Street banks professed surprise at Lehman¹s
> accounting maneuvers. Goldman Sachs
> <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/goldman_sachs_group_inc
> /index.html?inline=nyt-org> , Barclays
> <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/barclays_plc/index.html
> ?inline=nyt-org>  Capital, and other banks said on Friday that they did not
> use repos to hide liabilities on their balance sheets.
> 
>  
> Lehman report may point way for criminal charges
> Dan Margolies
> WASHINGTON
> Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:36pm EST
> http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62B4M820100312
> <http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62B4M820100312>
> WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An explosive report by a court-appointed examiner on
> the collapse of Lehman Brothers may prove to be a roadmap for prosecutors to
> bring criminal cases against the investment bank's former executives, legal
> experts say.
> 
> The 2,200-page report could lay the groundwork for felony charges under
> securities fraud laws, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act or New York's Martin Act, which
> is more expansive than federal securities laws, the experts say.
> 
> "I think there are definitely criminal liability issues here -- especially for
> at least the handful of executives who sent emails making clear they knew they
> were helping Lehman hide its liabilities," said Elizabeth Nowicki, a former
> lawyer with the Securities and Exchange Commission and now a visiting
> professor at Boston University School of Law.
> 
> Even with a roadmap, getting to a place where a criminal case can be brought
> will be difficult. The bar is high, as prosecutors must be able to prove
> intent. And while Lehman may have been at the epicenter of the financial
> quake, it was not the only failure during the financial crisis.
> 
> That may explain why, a year and a half after the Lehman bankruptcy, no
> criminal cases have yet been announced.
> 
> Still, a dozen former Lehman executives, including former CEO Richard Fuld,
> have been subpoenaed in federal grand jury investigations. Representatives for
> both the U.S. attorney in Manhattan and the U.S. attorney in Brooklyn declined
> to comment on Friday.
> 
> The report by the examiner, Anton Valukas, a former prosecutor and chairman of
> the law firm Jenner & Block, points to one direction prosecutors may take --
> accounting tricks.
> 
> The report details how Lehman used an accounting gimmick to move $50 billion
> in assets off its balance sheet, making the now-bankrupt banking firm appear
> financially healthier than it was.
> 
> The report said the use of the accounting device was "materially misleading"
> and done for the sole purpose of "balance sheet manipulation."
> 
> In finding that there may be "colorable claims" against senior officers who
> oversaw and certified misleading financial statements, the report virtually
> invited prosecutors to bring claims under Sarbanes-Oxley, which imposes
> criminal penalties on CEOs and CFOs who knowingly attest to misleading
> statements.
> 
> "What Sarbanes-Oxley tried to do was eliminate the old 'blind, deaf and dumb'
> defense of CEOs," said Terry Connelly, dean of the Edward S. Ageno School of
> Business at Golden Gate University and a former executive at Salomon Brothers.
> 
> "The question is whether the treatment of these accounting transactions was
> material and misleading. Did it matter to the market? The answer is, of
> course, yes. The relevant question is whether they were misleading, and the
> facts there, I think, speak for themselves."
> 
> In a statement on Thursday evening, a lawyer for Fuld said the former chief
> executive "did not know what those transactions were -- he didn't structure or
> negotiate them, nor was he aware of their accounting treatment."
> 
> Connelly called that response "very much like the old deaf, dumb and blind
> defense."
> 
> "You could get away with that before Sarbanes-Oxley. I'm not sure you can get
> away with that now," he said.
> 
> To make it appear that it was reducing its debt levels in 2008, Lehman
> employed an accounting device called "Repo 105," a kind of repurchase
> agreement.
> 
> Lehman did not disclose the Repo 105 transactions to the investing public and
> a top Lehman executive, global financial controller Martin Kelly, believed
> "there was no substance to the transactions," according to the examiner's
> report.
> 
> "These transactions were undertaken for no legitimate economic purpose," said
> Bill Black, a criminologist at the University of Missouri-Kansas City and a
> former savings and loan regulator. "They were done to game the numbers."
> 
> To the extent investors were kept in the dark, "you have all the elements here
> of felony securities fraud," he added.
> 
> Black said criminal culpability could reach Fuld if prosecutors proceed up the
> chain, first targeting those responsible for the accounting chicanery and
> "flipping" them to obtain their testimony against higher-ups.
> 
> "It's pretty hard to conceive that prosecutors would not go after them. And
> those guys are going to point the finger at the chief financial officers, who
> will point the finger at the CEO," he said.
> 
> Dan Richman, a law professor at Columbia University, said Valukas had produced
> "a thorough and intensive report" that could prove invaluable to prosecutors
> and civil enforcement agencies like the Securities and Exchange Commission.
> 
> "It certainly provides a very major assist to prosecutors trying to understand
> particularly complex transactions over a long period of time," Richman said.
> 
> Several legal experts speculated that New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo,
> who has not been shy about going after Wall Street and is widely expected to
> run for governor, may be the first law enforcement official to jump in. With
> New York's Martin Act, Cuomo has an especially potent tool at his disposal to
> combat financial fraud.
> 
> The once-dormant law, which was enacted in 1921, was used by New York Attorney
> General Eliot Spitzer in bringing cases, both civil and criminal, in
> investigations of Wall Street research, mutual fund market timing and
> insurance brokers.
> 
> Cuomo has deployed the law recently in pursuing a lawsuit against Bank of
> America Corp and its former chief executive, Kenneth Lewis, and former chief
> financial officer, Joe Price, accusing them of misleading shareholders about
> the bank's acquisition of Merrill Lynch & Co.
> 
> A spokesman for Cuomo's office did not respond to a request for comment on
> Friday.
> 
> "I think prosecutors are going to have a very difficult time NOT moving
> forward with criminal charges," Nowicki, of Boston University, said.
> 
> "The reality is that this report, after experts and the media start going
> through and commenting on it, is going to stir up some level of public outrage
> that I don't think the SEC or the Department of Justice is going to want to
> ignore."
> 
> 
> ------ End of Forwarded Message

Reply via email to