[Josh to bcc] Hi Uri,
I can review this for you. Is your observation that we never return STATUS_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL? It's either STATUS_SUCCESS or STATUS_NO_MORE_ENTRIES? Do you have traces? Bryan -----Original Message----- From: Josh Curry Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 9:10 AM To: Uri Simchoni <u...@samba.org> Cc: cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org; MSSolve Case Email <casem...@microsoft.com> Subject: RE: [MS-SMB] - status code of NT_TRANS_QUERY_QUOTA [REG:116091614680032] Hi Uri, thank you for your question. Case 116091614680032 has been created to track your issue. A member of the protocol documentation team will be in touch with you soon. Josh Curry | Escalation Engineer | Open Specifications Support Team P +1 469 775 2321 One Microsoft Way, 98052, Redmond, WA, USA http://support.microsoft.com -----Original Message----- From: Uri Simchoni [mailto:u...@samba.org] Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 3:39 AM To: Interoperability Documentation Help <doch...@microsoft.com> Cc: cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org Subject: [MS-SMB] - status code of NT_TRANS_QUERY_QUOTA Hi, In [MS-SMB], section 3.3.5.11.2 "Receiving an NT_TRANS_QUERY_QUOTA Request", it is indicated that: If the entire quota information cannot fit in the response buffer, then the server MUST return a status of STATUS_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL. Otherwise, the server MUST return STATUS_SUCCESS. In practice (trying against Server 2012R2) I see that the server returns STATUS_SUCCESS as long as it has more entries, and STATUS_NO_MORE_ENTRIES when there are no more entries. Can you please clarify? Thanks, Uri. _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol