Hello Metze, I am reviewing this and will follow-up with you. Thanks, Edgar
-----Original Message----- From: Sreekanth Nadendla Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 8:39 AM To: Stefan Metzmacher <me...@samba.org> Cc: cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org; MSSolve Case Email <casem...@microsoft.com> Subject: 117090816306100 [MS-NRPC] interaction with SYSVOLReady =0 Casemail in Cc Dochelp in Bcc Hello Stefan, Thank you for your inquiry about MS-NRPC open specification. We have created incident #117090816306100 to investigate this issue. One of the Open specifications team member will contact you shortly. Regards, Sreekanth Nadendla Microsoft Windows Open Specifications -----Original Message----- From: Stefan Metzmacher [mailto:me...@samba.org] Sent: Friday, September 8, 2017 5:06 AM To: Interoperability Documentation Help <doch...@microsoft.com> Cc: cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org Subject: [MS-NRPC] interaction with SYSVOLReady =0 Hi DocHelp, I had the situation where a Windows 2012 DC returns NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED for all NetrLogonSamLogonEx requests. I finally managed to find that the DC didn't provide SYSVOL and NETLOGON shares, this led to checking the SYSVOLReady key and it was 0. (Under HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Netlogon\Parameters) After manually changing SYSVOLReady to 1 (just for short term testing) NetrLogonSamLogonEx() worked fine. I guess the following section in [MS-NRPC] 3.5.4.5.1 NetrLogonSamLogonEx is supposed to describe this: If the server cannot service the request due to an implementation-specific condition, the server SHOULD return STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. Can this please be extended maybe with a windows behavior note, proposing SYSVOLReady = 0 as a possible reason for this behavior. Is there more affected by this registry key than all NetrLogonSamLogon* calls. I'm wondering why [MS-ADTS] 6.3.3 LDAP Ping or 6.3.5 Mailslot Ping would still return "normal" results in that case. As Samba made use of such a DC, I'd guess yes, but I haven't verified if we just ignore a LOGON_SAM_PAUSE_RESPONSE* response. Thanks! metze _______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
