[Mike to Bcc] Hi David,
Thanks for reaching out. After a cursory look, you are correct. The "ctx" parameter is not listed in RFC 7515. It appears that we discuss derivation of the "ctx" parameter in an earlier section (3.1.5.1.3.3). I will suggest the following as a modification to the doc: From: "The JWT header fields MUST be given the following values. See [RFC7515]<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=691168> section 4 for field descriptions." To: "The JWT header fields MUST be given the following values. See [RFC7515]<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=691168> section 4 for field descriptions. The derivation for the "ctx" parameter is discussed in section 3.1.5.1.3.3." Would this document modification provide the needed clarity? Regards, Kristian Smith Support Escalation Engineer | Azure DevOps, Windows Protocols | Microsoft® Corporation Office phone: +1 425-421-4442 Email: kristian.sm...@microsoft.com<mailto:kristian.sm...@microsoft.com> ________________________________ From: Michael Bowen <mike.bo...@microsoft.com> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 2:34 PM To: David Mulder <dmul...@samba.org> Cc: cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org <cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org>; Microsoft Support <supportm...@microsoft.com> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [MS-OAPXBC] 3.2.5.1.3.1 JWT header undefined `ctx` - TrackingID#2401260010005387 [DocHelp to bcc] Hi David Thanks for your question about MS-OAPXBC. We've created case 2401260010005387 to track this issue. One of our engineers will contact you soon. Best regards, Mike Bowen Escalation Engineer - Microsoft Open Specifications -----Original Message----- From: David Mulder <dmul...@samba.org> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 12:59 PM To: Interoperability Documentation Help <doch...@microsoft.com> Cc: cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [MS-OAPXBC] 3.2.5.1.3.1 JWT header undefined `ctx` [MS-OAPXBC] 3.2.5.1.3.1 says that the header fields of the JWT are defined in [RFC7515]. Then it says we must provide: `ctx (REQUIRED): The base64-encoded bytes used for signature key derivation.` There is no definition in [RFC7515] for a header field called `ctx`. -- David Mulder Labs Software Engineer, Samba SUSE 1221 S Valley Grove Way, Suite 500 Pleasant Grove, UT 84062 (P)+1 385.208.2989 dmul...@suse.com https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.suse.com%2F&data=05%7C02%7CKristian.Smith%40microsoft.com%7C5f633984809b44a026a308dc1ebefc7a%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C638419052844432915%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ykJAYLFzhewRuLwmoB6sTg%2B5gefcBYUuYS5SE9ib%2FUg%3D&reserved=0<http://www.suse.com/>
_______________________________________________ cifs-protocol mailing list cifs-protocol@lists.samba.org https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
