Hi Obaid
this wasn't an inquiry for the exact wording, but for the logical change
in my own wording. Makes sense?
On 3/17/25 7:44 PM, Obaid Farooqi wrote:
Hi Ralph:
The final document change is the prerogative of the product team. I only
describe the issue with the document and suggest what IMO is the proper update,
but I cannot guarantee that.
Regards,
Obaid Farooqi
Escalation Engineer | Microsoft
-----Original Message-----
From: Ralph Boehme <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2025 12:48 PM
To: Obaid Farooqi <[email protected]>
Cc: Microsoft Support <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: MS-FSA 2.1.4.17 Algorithm for Noting That a File
Has Been Modified - TrackingID#2503100040000894
Hi Obaid,
On 3/17/25 6:36 PM, Obaid Farooqi wrote:
I have filed a bug to update MS-FSA.
Please let me know if this does not answer your question.
iow you'll remove the two sentences
If Open.Stream.AllocationSize is equal to NewAllocationSize, the
operation MUST return STATUS_SUCCESS.
and
If Open.Stream.Size is equal to InputBuffer.EndOfFile, the
operation MUST return STATUS_SUCCESS at this point.
right?
Plus mentioning that when extending FileAllocationInformation update
changetime, not modificationtime and when shrinking, update both.
Right?
Thanks!
-slow
_______________________________________________
cifs-protocol mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/cifs-protocol
