I did a quick build on Debian 11 aarch64 from the git. I am sorry to report it fails on multiple places in thirdparty, with errors such as "invalid option -k" . Have not looked at it in detail yet.
MatN On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 15:04:13 -0700 Phyllis Smith via Cin <[email protected]> wrote: > Checked into GIT, thirdparty/Makefile which includes the > modifications from Andrew of autoconf/autoreconf needed for aarches64 > and the lidv-1.0.0.patch0 (also needed because libdv would not > compile without it on Fedora 32 or Debian 11.0 32-bit). Attached is > its log file when it would not compile. Before adding the patch, I > had installed what I could find on a Fedora system for > "libsdl1(-dev)" but it did not fix the error -- I did a "yum install > libsdl*" and it installed stuff but I only saw version 2 and not 1 > and did not see any libsdl at all. Also checked another Fedora > system to see what it would have installed and I just get: > [root@keystone Downloads]# yum install libsdl1* Last metadata > expiration check: 1:05:20 ago on Wed 05 Jan 2022 01:55:05 PM MST. > No match for argument: libsdl1* > Error: Unable to find a match: libsdl1* > > Part of the patch contained these lines which I thought were > HILARIOUS ! +# Configure paths for SDL > +# Sam Lantinga 9/21/99 > +# *stolen from Manish Singh* > +# s*tolen back from Frank Belew* > +# s*tolen from Manish Singh* > +# *Shamelessly stolen from Owen Taylor* > > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 5:54 AM Andrew Randrianasulu > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > just put in thirdparty/src as libdv-1.0.0.patch0 and see if it > > helps ? > > > > I build with clang, also (default for x86 linux usually gcc) > > > > On Tuesday, January 4, 2022, Andrew Randrianasulu > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Tuesday, January 4, 2022, Phyllis Smith > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Andrew, attached is the thirdparty Makefile that I would like to > >>> check into GIT tomorrow. I hope it includes all of the patches > >>> you provided in respect to autoconf. It builds and runs > >>> correctly on Fedora 32 and Debian 32-bit 11.0 Bullseye. The only > >>> thing that I know is still missing is the line: libdv.cfg_vars?= > >>> autoreconf -ifv -I m4 && automake -caf; which I have > >>> commented out. It fails on both Fedora and Debian (I will have > >>> to attach another config.log file but forgot to move it over > >>> yet). I will look at it again tomorrow but may have to wait > >>> until MatN looks at it to figure out what is wrong. > >> > >> > >> you tried to install libsdl1(-dev) on build host? > >> > >> I have it onstalled as dependency of some other package... > >> > >> sorry, not yet extracted patch supposed to fix 'autoreconf in > >> libdv in adsense of libsdl' from previous mail... > >> > >> > >> but thanks anyway.... > >> > >>> > >>> Even STRANGER than you think! When I compare "exit 2" (the > >>> non-working > >>>>> config.log) to "exit 0" (the working config.log), it shows the > >>>>> bad one using Autoconf 2.6*9 *but the one that works uses > >>>>> Autoconf 2.6*0.* This does not make sense. And so 2.6*9* may > >>>>> be causing the problem identified on line 52 but I do not know > >>>>> why. There must be a parameter on the ling > >>>>> Line 52: configure:2661: WARNING: 'missing' script is too old > >>>>> or missing > >>>>> > >>>>> There must be a parameter on the line: libdv.cfg_vars?= > >>>>> autoreconf -ifv -I m4 && automake -caf; > >>>>> that makes it use a different autoconf? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> yeah, it was part of change required for for auto-updating > >>>> config. guess (for aarch64) > >>>> > >>>> -- Cin mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
