вс, 20 нояб. 2022 г., 01:23 Phyllis Smith <phylsmith2...@gmail.com>:
> *IgorBeghetto:* > I created an AppImage that contains the BT #558 bug fix (0x00 vs. 0xff) > AND with these 2 Experimental patches in to fix "nested edl undo crash" so > you could test if you find the time. The fix for 558 is the most important > though and you already built that. It is at: > https://cinelerra-gg.org/download/testing/test_ubuntu16.AppImage > > Locking and unlocking are extremely sensitive and can cause all kinds of > weird crashes so I guess that is why the patch is called EXPERIMENTAL. But > could definitely be the missing part and fix the problem. > I recompiled cingg on my Slackware without those two patches and sadly crash on nested edl load/undo still around :( Phyllis, can you just add part with checking existence of edl, and may be leave locking changes out for now? ( I thought we should unlock in same function if we exit from it but may be I am wrong ...) > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 6:50 PM Andrew Randrianasulu < > randrianas...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> ---------- Forwarded message --------- >> От: Андрей Рандрианасулу <rand...@mail.ru> >> Date: пн, 14 нояб. 2022 г., 04:37 >> Subject: oh, my fix for nested edl undo crash regressed video! >> To: randrianasulu <randrianas...@gmail.com> >> >> >> better (?) fix (tested with video this time) >> >> -- >> Андрей Рандрианасулу >> >
-- Cin mailing list Cin@lists.cinelerra-gg.org https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin