вс, 29 окт. 2023 г., 19:04 Phyllis Smith <[email protected]>:
> Thanks - waiting for download site, https://ffmpeg.org/download.html , to > update tar ball to 6.1. > I guess nv headers also should be updated, so hopefully patch10 will not needed? https://github.com/FFmpeg/nv-codec-headers/releases > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 9:40 AM Andrew Randrianasulu < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> вс, 29 окт. 2023 г., 18:38 Andrew Randrianasulu <[email protected] >> >: >> >>> >>> >>> вс, 29 окт. 2023 г., 18:27 Phyllis Smith <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Oh wow. I guess I learned a lesson here -- don't wait for the point 1 >>>> (.1) release. But still I am a little confused because I always thought >>>> that the point 1 release was to fix flaws in the main release and not to >>>> add new features. >>>> >>> >>> I think ffmpeg uses x.x.1 and x.x.2 and so on as stable release .... so >>> 5.0.1 or something will be stable, but without new features .... >>> >>> also, there is whole idea of LTS (long term support ) - depend on >>> software it can be year (firefox, lol) to 3 years (blender) to some more >>> years. FFmpeg tried to switch some releases to LTS model but .... :) >>> >>> actually, even 2.8 branch still get some fixes as far as I can see >>> >>> https://git.ffmpeg.org/gitweb/ffmpeg.git/shortlog/refs/heads/release/2.8 >>> >>> but we usually want something a bit newer :) >>> >>> Not really your fault, it was sort of announced to be in summer, but >>> slipped away .... >>> >> >> oh, it was just branched few minutes ago! >> >> https://git.ffmpeg.org/gitweb/ffmpeg.git/shortlog/refs/heads/release/6.1 >> >>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 8:58 AM Andrew Randrianasulu < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2023-October/316264.html >>>>> >>>>
-- Cin mailing list [email protected] https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
