Den 07.11.2023 16:32, skrev Andrew Randrianasulu:
вт, 7 нояб. 2023 г., 18:13 Andrew Randrianasulu <randrianasulu at gmail.com
<https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin>>:
>//>/https://blender.stackexchange.com/questions/46825/render-with-a-wider-dynamic-range-in-cycles-to-produce-photorealistic-looking-im
/>//>//>/well, this one says EXR can hold quite a big value per channel, way
above />/1.0f, obviously. But for displaying (and encoding?) it must be
compressed />/back to device-specific 0 - 1.0 range. />//>/Thing is, if I open exr example file in gimp 2.10 and re-export it - it />/retain its above 100% values. It does not do this if I do this same />/roundtrip via cingg. So yea, we seems to be clamping at output. />//
and this article about Premiere tries to explain Scopes, and especially
floating point vs 8bit input - Premiere apparently can limit this setting
for scopes themselves....
https://blog.frame.io/2017/09/27/introduction-to-video-scopes/
By looking through the mail archive this month, I will just shortly add a user
comment to the images in the latter url:
(I hope it will fit not too badly into the exiting mail thread)
* Figure 1. Waveform Scope for an under-exposed shot
* Figure 2. Waveform Scope after the shot is corrected
Fig. 1 is a typical dark shot in low-light or backlight conditions. I have also
experienced similar results after digitizing analog SD video, apparently due to
relative low color resolution.
Fig. 2 is the brighter, shiny video or shot result we normally want.
https://filmora.wondershare.com/video-editing/brighten-video-in-premiere-pro.html
To compare with my smartphone (Pixel 7 Pro), I use "Night Mode" (with AI I
think) to lighten up during shooting, or by editing photos with the dynamic or enhance
tool.
so, HDR as used in ultra HD need some scope that goes to 10.000 (so,
logarithmic I guess ...)!
something we should write somewhere in TODO, I guess .....
--
Cin mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cinelerra-gg.org/mailman/listinfo/cin
