-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Raffaella Traniello schrieb: > Thanks Hermann. > Even if in a hurry you gave me many new subjects to work on. > > I have to learn a lot about digital video. > I studying to understand interlacing. > Is my 3CCD mini DV camera footage interlaced? Currently, all TV is interlaced. Here in europ, TV uses the PAL standard, which means "25i". This denotes 50 halfimages per second corresponding to 25 full images per second.
> What chance have I to use progressive scanned material? Some cameras provide a "progressive scan" mode. Another option is allways, to de-interlace the matereial by software before editing or after the final render. Note that "interlaced" is not always "bad" and progressive is not automatically "good". Each has its pros and cons. If you want to play back your edited video on a normal TV at some point, then interlaced may give a better quality, but if you only want to watch on computers or distribute a low-bandwith version via internet, then you are better off with progressive scan. Of course, best would be, if we could have 50p always :-) have you alredy found this page? http://www.100fps.com/ > On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 19:48 +0200, Ichthyostega wrote: >> I use the following settings (geared at maximum quality playback on pc): Raffaella Traniello schrieb: > Where do you set them? In the Render Window, there is a checkbox "Render Video tracks" and "Render Audio tracks". Between the label and the Checkbox, there is a "tool" Icon. Clicking this gives you the detail selection dialogbox... Cheers, Hermann -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFE9MtKZbZrB6HelLIRAqIQAKCwY8QFgMETzuL/sTrlPFlrEG8LkQCeNqiU rdUaGzZJpJerps5Lsv2WGa4= =TqPv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
