-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello Hannes,

thanks for pushing out the latest changes.

If i remember correctly we have now merged nearly everything that was
intended to be merged, except for one of Monty's alsa fixes, that caused
serious playback problems for Hannes.

So what do we still want to merge before releasing Cin2.1.5CV? (except for
an update of the about page / version variable ;))

Personally speaking I would prefer a release rather soon for the following
reasons:

1. a "new version" should encourage distributions to build new packages
which should decrease the time that has to be spend for answering "where
can i get (the latest) packages for XY"

2. a "new version" should encourage users to look for "new (old) bugs",
hopefully resulting in new tickets on bugs.cinelerra.org. Adding a new
version there makes it easier to keep track of what is still an issue.
(I'm aware that many old bugs aren't fixed yet, but we won't fix them all
in finite time, so waiting for all bugs being fixed would prohibit the
release of > 2.1 forever ;-))

3. a "new version" might encourage someone to contribute again some
patches, as he/she sees that something is going on with cinelerra. (e.g.
gentoo's patches weren't forwarded to our ML at some point as nothing happened)

4. releasing other bugfix releases (e.g. 2.1.6) should become "easier" to
do when a first step is done.

Hannes, Monty, Einar, what do you think? (as you've contributed most of the
new patches)

With best regards,
Simeon



On 11/04/10 21:08, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 3. November 2010, Simeon Völkel wrote:
>> I've just reformatted Monty's three patches you hadn't committed yet due to
>> their formatting. They are now available in my git repo, together with an
>> extended commit message written my Monty. I hope you can merge them now
>> into your repo, so that we get a step closer to the release of Cin2.1.5CV.
> 
> Thanks, I appreciate it.
> 
> I pushed out these patches, but I substituted Monty as author. (I hope you 
> don't mind.)
nope, just wasn't aware of how to do that :)

> 
> -- Hannes
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkzTKmEACgkQph/voQkhF7wnswCgiMqOwHb4qG8q3Q0Tktqx46AK
NcoAn35VTNpfweWfTefdsB8Gup9Vpkao
=027Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Cinelerra mailing list
Cinelerra@skolelinux.no
https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra

Reply via email to