If someone is running 12.3(4)T9 their upgrade path is 12.4 mainline. Rodney
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:27:36PM +0100, Mark Tohill wrote: > > Tomas, > > Here goes. > > It turns out we had simialr problems with 'T' images in other PoP's for > routers also acting as L2TP LNS's. We upgraded to 12.3(20) GD image and > have not seen same problems. > > Maybe an idea to do same for this also. > > Cisco IOS Software, 7200 Software (C7200-JK9S-M), Version 12.3(4)T9, > RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport > Copyright (c) 1986-2004 by Cisco Systems, Inc. > Compiled Fri 22-Oct-04 17:51 by cmong > > ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 12.3(4r)T1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) > BOOTLDR: 7200 Software (C7200-KBOOT-M), Version 12.3(5a), RELEASE > SOFTWARE (fc1) > > ROUTER uptime is 1 year, 31 weeks, 6 days, 2 hours, 34 minutes > System returned to ROM by reload at 03:46:08 GMT Sat May 27 2000 > System restarted at 08:48:21 gmt Fri Aug 19 2005 > System image file is "disk2:c7200-jk9s-mz.123-4.T9.bin" > Last reload reason: Reload command > > Cisco 7204VXR (NPE-G1) processor (revision B) with 491520K/32768K bytes > of memory. > Processor board ID > SB-1 CPU at 700Mhz, Implementation 1, Rev 0.2, 512KB L2 Cache > 4 slot VXR midplane, Version 2.9 > > Last reset from power-on > > PCI bus mb1 has 300 bandwidth points > PCI bus mb2 has 0 bandwidth points > > 3 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces > 1 ATM interface > 509K bytes of NVRAM. > > 62720K bytes of ATA PCMCIA card at slot 2 (Sector size 512 bytes). > 16384K bytes of Flash internal SIMM (Sector size 256K). > Configuration register is 0x2102 > > sh mem summary > Head Total(b) Used(b) Free(b) Lowest(b) > Largest(b) > Processor 640CEEC0 435360064 134291796 301068268 293653620 > 262148624 > I/O E000000 33554432 6088336 27466096 2965624 > 23620956 > > > I assume you didn't want/need the entire output? > > Thanks, > Mark > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tomas Caslavsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 30 March 2007 11:41 > To: Mark Tohill > Subject: RE: [c-nsp] 7200VXR running 12.394)T9 > Tracebacks,%SYS-3-INVMEMINT: etc... > > Hello Mark, > > For me this looks like that you run out of memory. > Please can you send sh ver and sh mem sum ? > > Regarsd > > Tomas > > > > > Best Regards > Tomas Caslavsky > > +---------------------------------------------------------------+ > + Senior IP engineer + > + Interoute CZECH + > + Nad Elektrarnou 1428/47 + > + 106 00 Praha 10 + > + Prague + > + Czech RepubliC + > + Direct Phone: +420 225 352 675 + > + Mobile Phone: +420 731 492 872 + > + Skype: xcacin + > + Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] + > +---------------------------------------------------------------+ > "the impossible we can do - miracles take a little longer!" > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Tohill > Sent: 30 March 2007 12:17 > To: [email protected] > Subject: [c-nsp] 7200VXR running 12.394)T9 Tracebacks,%SYS-3-INVMEMINT: > etc... > > Hi, > > We have a 7204VXR running c7200-jk9s-mz.123-4.T9.bin (Enterprise IPSEC?) > acting as a L2TP LNS. > > we are seeing Tracebacks and other memory related 'issues' in logs: > > Mar 27 14:09:38.770 UTC: %SYS-3-INVMEMINT: Invalid memory action > (malloc) at interrupt level > -Traceback= 607413C4 607500C4 623396C4 62339768 623E9218 623EA054 > 61364858 607F11D4 6179CA7C 6179CCF8 6179EF28 6179F064 617A5C7C 6134FEF4 > 6046D310 604807AC Mar 27 14:09:38.778 UTC: %SYS-2-MALLOCFAIL: Memory > allocation of 3000 bytes failed from 0x607500BC, alignment 0 > Pool: Processor Free: 301567464 Cause: Interrupt level allocation > Alternate Pool: None Free: 0 Cause: No Alternate pool > > I cannot find any bugs specific to 12.4.T9 and Tracebacks etc in Bug > Toolkit. > > There is a deferral Notice for this release/platform/feature set > referring to CSCee09060 > <http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/Support/Bugtool/onebug.pl?bugid=CSCee09060 > > but not specifically to what we are seeing. 12.3(4)T9 seems to have > been removed as a download in Upgrade Planner. > > Is this telling me thats a bad image to be running? (I think so). Can > anyone advise? > > Thanks, > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
