Thats interesting. Do you have an example of this? Thanks, Dan.
Joseph Jackson wrote: > I believe you could do OSPF on the internet borders and do a default > originate and then the OSPF costs would take over. Which is what I > believe the other poster is leading up too. > > > Joseph > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan >> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 7:08 PM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] routing question >> >> Bruce Pinsky wrote: >> >>> Dan wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> Diagram: >>>> >>>> >> http://bp0.blogger.com/_ZwoccirELZg/RhPQ4QRWSEI/AAAAAAAAAAM/Jn >> XNbHL_PQs/s1600-h/routing+question.jpg >> >>>> I have all of my 3550's & 3560's running ospf and the >>>> >> 2950's & 2960's >> >>>> trunking to the 3550's and 3560's. I would like for location >>>> >>> 2960-14 to >>> >>>> get its internet from Internet West and location 2960-07 >>>> >> to get its >> >>>> internet from Internet East. Currently the 0.0.0.0 >>>> >> 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.1 >> >>>> (default gateway) is causing them both to resort to Internet west. >>>> >>> (hope >>> >>>> this is not to confusing) >>>> >>>> Is there a way I can route the default gateway according to source >>>> networks without having to use PBR? The reason I don't >>>> >> want to use PBR >> >>>> is because if there is any significant amount of traffic >>>> >> going through >> >>>> the 3550 or 3560 it will cause really high cpu utilization on the >>>> switch. Is there some kind of static routing that can be >>>> >> done, or can >> >>>> use use the 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.1 route command >>>> >> according to source >> >>>> subnet? >>>> >>>> eg: >>>> >>>> if the source ip is 192.168.7.0/24 then use default >>>> >> gateway 0.0.0.0 >> >>>> 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2 instead? >>>> >>>> The other question is should I replace this switch with a router >>>> >>> instead? >>> >>> >>> If you are running OSPF and the costs are as shown in your >>> >> diagram, why >> >>> aren't normally IGP metrics taking you to the closest exit >>> >> point? Aren't >> >>> you generating default from the Internet gateways? >>> >> On switch 3550-02 the default route of 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.50.2.24 is >> pointing to switch 3550-24. The default route on that switch >> is 0.0.0.0 >> 0.0.0.0 10.50.1.20 which is 3560-20 and then it hits the router. So >> locations 2960-14 & 2960-07 are getting there internet from Internet >> west because of the default routes. What I want to do is >> have location >> 2960-07 get its internet from Internet east. >> >> >>> You could, of course, use VRF-lite and place them in >>> >> separate routing >> >>> instances in lieu of PBR. >>> >>> >> I still need the ospf routes to work, does this forward all >> traffic to a >> different destination? >> Would you have an example of this? >> >> Dan. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> >> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
