Welcome the miracle of tacacs.
On 4/21/07, Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 07:50:32PM +0200, Oliver Boehmer (oboehmer) wrote: > > omar parihuana <> wrote on Saturday, April 21, 2007 7:32 PM: > > > > > Hi list, > > > > > > We're redesigning a small MPLS Network (about 30 PE Routers and 2 P > > > Routers -Link between P-PE: Ethernet-), so far the IGP is OSPF, > > > however ISIS was proposed too. What is the best? IS-IS or OSPF? and > > > Why? regarding the small network. > > > > check the archives, this has been discussed before.. it boils down to > > "use what you're most comfortable and familiar with", and as you're > > using OSPF already, the choice should be clear. > > Possibly the single most annoying difference is that Cisco uses the > command "ip router isis <tag>" to activate isis on an interface, vs just > "ip ospf" with no "router". Now imagine you're tired and trying to take > isis off an interface, and instead of typing "no ip router isis" you > accidentally type "no router isis", and guess what happens. :) > > -- > Richard A Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras > GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC) > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/