On May 15, 2007, at 11:23 PM, Scott Granados wrote: > Well can't we don't care bit ourselves around to masking or something > consistent? It is confusing at times although it's interesting to > know > that's the origin.
If it were up to me (it's not ;-), the UI would be extended to accept prefix format as well as the existing format. Thus, you could type 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 or 192.168.1/24. Note that trying to do something that is NOT backward compatible is just a non-starter. Think of the number of deployed systems out there... Tony _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
