One thing you might also want to look at is the problem of going GE ----> 2x155 ----> GE. Hosts on the GE links will be able to burst above the ~300M of your intermediate link. This will cause buffers to fill and overflow causing packet drops and TCP slow start. Ironically, changing the GE links to 100M might improve performance. Or, you could traffic-shape, which seems to be the way you're looking to go.
Joe "Pak Tong Poy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/11/2007 09:59 PM To "Indra Simalango" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc [email protected] Subject Re: [c-nsp] WAN optimization in IP carrier Hi my network topo is something like this ----GE------ [Router]----------2 X STM1----------[Router]----GE------Upstream transit I wish to reduce the Upstream transit traffic, so I can only put the Optimization box in between the link like this: ----GE------[WAN Optimization box] ----- GE ------- [Router]----------2 X STM1----------[Router]----GE------[WAN Optimization box]-----GE-------Upstream transit My target applications to be optimized are Static applications such as file transfer, pdf, static video...etc. Any suggestion? best regards On 6/7/07, Indra Simalango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm quite newbie in this field. So far, in my current company, I've done > some PoC using Cisco WAAS and Packeteer PacketShaperXpress (the one with > Acceleration & Compression module). > > For your requirements, how much WAN bandwidth do you have? What is each > connection type? Is it a fiberoptic, gigabit ethernet, or fair ethernet? > If > may, please describe your network profile, what's main application > traverse > your WAN? Also, is there any requirement for Server consolidation? > > Thank you. > > > Indra A. Simalango > Associate Consultant, BSS/OSS > PT. Packet Systems Indonesia > www.dmxtechnologies.com > > On 5/25/07, Pak Tong Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi group, > > Anyone knows if there is any WAN optimization product for IP carrier > > environment? I know there are product for entreprise environment. If so > > there are, anyone knows any IP carrier use them? > > Many thanks, > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
