Hi, If both sides are in same vlan / subnet then there is no need for any routing to take place. Traffic between these vlan members will travel across the trunk without any need to consult the routing table since the network should be 'directly connected'.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hitesh Vinzoda Sent: Sunday, 2 September 2007 1:56 PM To: Cisco Mailing list Subject: [c-nsp] Routed Vlans Dear All, I have got a Layer 3 switch attached to a layer 3 switch and ospf running between them. the link between them is a layer 2 trunk.just because i have to extend a vlan which is behind the trunk. when i perform TRACERT i can see the ip of the interfaces of both switches. does this mean the traffic is routed even if it is going L2 trunk. I want to route the Vlan over routed link and function as layer 2 vlan. is it possible...? means *PC (VLAN 25) >>>>>>> L3 Switch>>>>Trunk + OSPF>>>>>>L3 switch >>>>>PC (VLAN25)* I want the VLans to travel to a routed link instead of that right now it is going through a configured trunk. Please advice. Thanks & Regards Ronnie _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/