The issue is we cannot advertise to the net any sub /24 nets. Thus, we need to control those some how with an internal mesh - but the old and the new locations are not physically connected in anyway (yet), except through the internet.
-----Original Message----- From: Steve Bertrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 1:14 AM To: Dan Troxel Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Looking for suggestions on how to link old colo with the new colo for routing purposes until new circuits are in place > Problem: Since we cannot run BGP on any network smaller than a /24, how do > we connect all the networks together, so that we can route internet > connectivity to the small subnets (smaller than class C)? I'm very new to this game, but from my understanding I will try. Please correct me if I am wrong, or if I am misunderstanding the problem: If you control all of the network routers, could you not advertise the sub /24 nets across your infrastructure via iBGP, and then aggregate them all together at your border routers that face the 100Mbps connections and advertise them aggregated from there? >From what I do know for fact, is that adding in any type of encryption just to do routing adds a burden of overhead that is apparently not what you want. Or do I have this all wrong? Steve _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
