On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 17:50 +0200, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou wrote: > To make it even uglier, you can configure (using eem again) pbr under the > upstream interface to send > all these requests to the appropriate router, bypassing the connected routes.
There are lots of things I could do, that for reasons of common sense I choose not to. This would be one of them ;o) Practical alternatives exist (Extreme ESRP, Foundry FSRP) as well as design workarounds. None of which reduces the desirability of a Cisco-supplied feature upgrade "HSRP standby inactive interfaces" I'd love to get a final, definitive yes/no on this; at least then I could stop dreaming! _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
