I'd go with vip4. Did you mean vip4-80? I the extra memory and cpu will be needed. Aaron
On 10/30/07, neal rauhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a customer who is going to provide peering links from a 7507 to > two > different customers. They're going to take full routes and we're expecting > 25 - 50 mbits of traffic from each. Is a VIP2-50 with two PA-FE-TX going > to > handle this or will the extra juice of the VIP4-50 be required? > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
