Hi, Tipical behaviour if TCAM is overflowed. How many TCAM entries you have?
Janos Mohacsi Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projects NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882 On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Oupps sorry about that . > > This is the log of that specific day .I save you all the boring part but > does someone knows what does the entry below means ? Does it means " I am > not able to enable Cef ??????" > > ------------------------> Oct 29 06:25:35.486: %C6KFIB-4-DISABLED: > Hardware FIB forwarding disabled, reverting to only software forwarding. > > When i try to do a show ip cef this is what happens : > sclisgh022#sh ip cef > %CEF not running > > I can't try to enable it during business hour of course......... > > > > Here is the last system crash report > *************************************************** > ******* Information of Last System Crash ********** > *************************************************** > > > Using bootflash:crashinfo. > > %Error opening bootflash:crashinfo (File not found) > > *************************************************** > ****** Information of Last System Crash - SP ****** > *************************************************** > > > Using sup-bootflash:crashinfo_20070912-174409. > > 00:00:04: %PFREDUN-6-STANDBY: Initializing as STANDBY processor > 00:00:04: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHING: System pausing to ensure console > debugging output. > 00:00:04: %PFREDUN-6-STANDBY: Initializing as STANDBY processor > 00:00:04: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 to ensure > console debugging output. > Firmware compiled 20-Feb-07 14:12 by integ Build [100] > 00:00:11: %OIR-SP-STDBY-6-CONSOLE: Changing console ownership to route > processor > 00:00:11: %SYS-SP-STDBY-3-LOGGER_FLUSHING: System pausing to ensure > console debugging output. > 00:00:04: %SYS-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 to ensure > console debugging output. > Firmware compiled 20-Feb-07 14:12 by integ Build [100] > 00:00:11: %OIR-SP-STDBY-6-CONSOLE: Changing console ownership to route > processor > 00:00:11: %SYS-SP-STDBY-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 > to ensure console debugging output. > 00:00:55: %PFREDUN-SP-STDBY-6-STANDBY: Initializing for SSO mode > 00:00:55: %SYS-SP-STDBY-3-LOGGER_FLUSHING: System pausing to ensure > console debugging output. > 00:00:11: %SYS-SP-STDBY-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 > to ensure console debugging output. > 00:00:55: %PFREDUN-SP-STDBY-6-STANDBY: Initializing for SSO mode > 00:00:55: %SYS-SP-STDBY-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 > to ensure console debugging output. > 00:01:12: %PFREDUN-SP-STDBY-6-STANDBY: Failure of ACTIVE detected, STANDBY > not ready and reset > 00:00:55: %SYS-SP-STDBY-3-LOGGER_FLUSHED: System was paused for 00:00:00 > to ensure console debugging output. > 00:01:12: %PFREDUN-SP-STDBY-6-STANDBY: Failure of ACTIVE detected, STANDBY > not ready and reset > > %Software-forced reload > > I though Cef is enable by default on 6500s ? Looks like an harware issue > to me but you never know ! > Rgds. > David > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > London Telecom and Network > Societe Generale Corporate and Investment Banking > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 31/10/07 13:14 > > > To > David PONSDESSERRE/gb/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc > cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > Subject > Re: [c-nsp] 6704-10GE bug ? [NC] > > > > > > > On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 12:31 +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Hello list . >> Has anyone ever encountered a bug on a 6509 using 6704-10GE and Sup 720 >> 3BXL. >> We are running 12.2(18)SXF8 on it on both 10GE linecards went down on > the >> same time this morning here............................We had to reload > it >> to get things back to normal . > > Please start a new thread when posting, rather than hijacking others. > > I've not seen this specific problem, but you give almost no info so it's > impossible to tell. > > What did the routers log? Did you get any crashinfo files on the RP or > SP flash? > > > >> >> Any inputs are welcome , >> Cheers >> D. >> >> David Ponsdesserre >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> London Telecom and Network >> Societe Generale Corporate and Investment Banking >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > ************************************************************************* >> This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and > intended solely for the addressee(s). >> Any unauthorised use or dissemination is prohibited. E-mails are > susceptible to alteration. >> Neither SOCIETE GENERALE nor any of its subsidiaries or affiliates shall > be liable for the message if altered, changed or >> falsified. >> ************ >> Ce message et toutes les pieces jointes (ci-apres le "message") sont > confidentiels et etablis a l'intention exclusive de ses >> destinataires. Toute utilisation ou diffusion non autorisee est > interdite. Tout message electronique est susceptible d'alteration. >> La SOCIETE GENERALE et ses filiales declinent toute responsabilite au > titre de ce message s'il a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. >> > ************************************************************************* >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/