Hi,
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 03:28:36PM -0400, Andy Dills wrote:
> incrementing error counters anywhere on any layer. So I started trying
> different things and discovered the issue I mentioned in the email, as I
> have to assume once we resolve that issue the overall issue of packet loss
> will be fixed.
Is the link clean if you "flood ping" it? Send out 1500 byte packets
"back to back"? Like running multiple
cisco(enable)# ping $remote size 1500 repeat 1000
in parallel...
It *could* be a duplex issue (one part of the overall link being half-
duplex and its peer side being full-duplex). Or some component being
flakey when more than a few packets are seen.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
