On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 11:14:37AM +0300, Raymond Macharia wrote: > hi virendra, > > Per packet load sharing is CPU intensive
CPU intensive for who? > and if you are running something > like voice then it is not recommended that you run per packet. > Even with per packet you will never get exact load sharing for both links. > > Best Regards > > Raymond > > On Dec 10, 2007 4:39 AM, virendra rode // <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi, > > > > I have a GRE tunnel configured on a L3 device running ospf w/ cef > > enabled which ties into two edge routers in a dual-isp setup. > > > > > > L3 switch# > > > > int tun0 > > ip add 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252 > > tunnel source 192.168.0.1 > > tunnel destination 192.168.2.1 > > > > router ospf 100 > > network x.x.x.x y.y.y.y area 0 > > > > ip route x.x.x.x y.y.y.y 10.0.0.2 > > > > > > In order to distribute traffic (load-sharing) across two links I'm > > looking at enabling equal cost traffic (per-packet load sharing) going > > out both serial links as their data processing is overloading one link. > > The equal cost routes with CEF default load sharing is not distributing > > the load over the 2 links as expected. MLPPP is not an option for > > budget reasons hence I'm looking at doing per-packet. > > > > > > router-1# > > ip cef (enabled globally) > > ip cef load-sharing algorithm original > > > > fa0/0 connected to L3 on vlan5 > > > > interface Serial0/0/0:0 > > bandwidth 1544 > > no ip address > > encapsulation frame-relay > > frame-relay lmi-type cisco > > ip load-sharing per-packet > > > > > > interface Serial0/0/0:0.100 point-to-point > > bandwidth 1544 > > ip address x.x.x.x y.y.y.y > > frame-relay interface-dlci 100 > > > > > > router-2# > > ip cef (enabled globally) > > ip cef load-sharing algorithm original > > > > fa0/0 connected to L3 on vlan5 > > > > interface Serial0/0/0:0 > > bandwidth 1544 > > no ip address > > encapsulation frame-relay > > frame-relay lmi-type cisco > > ip load-sharing per-packet > > > > > > interface Serial0/0/0:0.200 point-to-point > > bandwidth 1544 > > ip address x.x.x.x y.y.y.y > > frame-relay interface-dlci 200 > > > > > > Any recommendation and /or feedback will be appreciated. > > > > > > > > regards, > > /virendra > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > > > iD8DBQFHXJi6pbZvCIJx1bcRAhA+AJwOmJrc51G2t+Z21SJNrh6XapMA9gCgsz40 > > hdhegCO5uU6vhlVTY1NyaaA= > > =MgKh > > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > > > -- > Raymond Macharia > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/