Something that I've been wondering about: We run iBGP confeds between 3 POPs (seems more natural than route-relectors), redundant routers at every POP, topology is essentially a big ring over L2 transport.
iBGP sessions are between IGP loopbacks. (I always thought iBGP should be between loopbacks, rather than interface addresses, that way sessions survive link failures without effect.) Is this correct, or is there an argument for iBGP between interface addresses, making BGP more "aware" of the underlying topology? Maybe it's a stupid question, but I haven't come up with a good answer yet... Tim:> _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
