-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sorry for responding to my own thread.
virendra rode // wrote: > Hi, > > Just wondering whether anyone is running similar setup in their > environment with either HSRP or GLBP. Due to lack of hardware I'm unable > to create this scenario in my lab so any sort of feedback will be > greatly appreciated. > > I have 2 routers in a HSRP setup where I have multiple p2p links coming > into ROUTER-A and ROUTER-B being used for dial-backup scenario. > > Say if I lost a p2p link on ROUTER-A and in a tracking scenario for > multiple p2p links would ROUTER-A switch over to standby although other > p2p links off ROUTER-A are still up and running? Is there a way to track > via network or would GLBP be a better fit for this scenario. > > > /---------ROUTER-A > > / || > > HSRP between these two SVI's > > \ || > > \---------ROUTER-B > > > > Let me know if you need further clarification. > > > > regards, > /virendra > - --------------------------------- If one link goes down, Router-A would remain active, but if two serial links went down, we would decrement its priority by a total of 6 (3 for each tracked interface). Basically one with most serial links up would become the active router. regards, /virendra -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHhQ9+pbZvCIJx1bcRAspmAKCTYdAdaI7mK7AFPTer+Hvin+7skQCdHVVp raEreu7uDaCQfXClLjARw7w= =GW4J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
