Gert Doering wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 02:15:40PM -0600, Justin Shore wrote: >> I'm in a similar boat as Jose. What options for EoMPLS do we people >> with 6700s have? I'm trying physical to physical with no luck. > > physical to physical should work, according to the documentation. I > haven't tried it yet, though. > > What IOS version did you try?
I'm running SRB on 3BXLs. Here's what I get when I try it on the physicals: 7613-1.clr#sh xconnect all Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State, S1=Segment1 State, S2=Segment2 State UP=Up, DN=Down, AD=Admin Down, IA=Inactive, NH=No Hardware XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2 S2 ------+---------------------------------+--+---------------------------------+-- DN ac Gi9/28(Ethernet) UP mpls 10.64.0.20:1234 DN 7613-2.clr#sh xcon 7613-2.clr#sh xconnect all Legend: XC ST=Xconnect State, S1=Segment1 State, S2=Segment2 State UP=Up, DN=Down, AD=Admin Down, IA=Inactive, NH=No Hardware XC ST Segment 1 S1 Segment 2 S2 ------+---------------------------------+--+---------------------------------+-- DN ac Gi9/28(Ethernet) UP mpls 10.64.0.10:1234 DN I got the same thing when trying SVIs. >> Sub-interface isn't an option for a particular design that I'm working >> on either. > > Sub-if is what we use today (because the other endpoint is a 7200 that can > *only* do sub-if in 12.2S). Works great :) I can arrange for a sub-int test later this week. I would love to own ES20s if the price was more reasonable. I can't justify buying the ES20 at 9x the cost ($60k + $40k +16k / 20 vs $15k + $15k / 48). That doesn't even include the SFPs. I'd like to see Cisco apply the "leather seat" theory to the ES blades. The theory states that if all car manufacturers switched to offering leather-trimmed seats by default (which the majority want) and charging extra for cloth seats (which the majority don't want) that the higher price of leather would shortly be offset by volume needed and would ultimately bring the price down to be on par with what the cloth seats previously cost. Applying this theory to the ES linecards, Cisco should make all Ethernet-based linecards with the ES capabilities, thus driving down the overall cost for linecards with the ES-capabilities and ending countless amounts of frustration for us engineers. :-) Justin _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/