There is a command "ip options ignore", but it's only availably on 12000 routers.
-- Tassos Ras wrote on 21/2/2008 5:15 μμ: > We make heavy use of Microsoft's MSMQ libraries to implement our PGM > messaging bus. Unfortunately this implementation of PGM likes to send > an awful lot of SPM messages within the PGM streams, each of which > have the Router Alert IP option set. > > At the moment we're seeing ~10kpps of these packets. Our distribution > layer (Cat4500, SupV) is melting under the pressure (90%+ CPU) and > Cisco don't seem to be able to give any clear indication as to whether > upgrading hardware would help (as these packets all get software > routed, simply moving to standard 'faster switching hardware' doesn't > help much). > > Has anyone else run into this problem? If so any ideas on how to > mitigate or resolve the issue? At the moment we're potentially looking > at having to move all our PGM speakers into a single gigantic > world-spanning VLAN to avoid having to route it, but that obviously > isn't an ideal solution. > > Thanks in advance, > Ras > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
