We have >2000 vrf's CPUs around 50% using about 150MB RAM, also mostly static into BGP and the odd eBGP session. Max routes set to 3000 per vrf but most are not even close.
So at this point in time we're not really sure when we will be running into issues on the G2's... ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:30:56 +0300 From: Saku Ytti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Suppoted VRF's on NPE-G2's To: [email protected] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On (2008-06-10 16:59 +0200), Mauritz lewies wrote: > Does any one have clear information on the maximum number of supported > VRF instances on Cisco 7200 NPE-G2's. We have +530 on box with five min average cpu of <30%. (+75% of that is I/O). Mostly static routes, few BGP couple handful of RIP. All on ATM (PA-A3, no the 'new' PA-A6). -- ++ytti Please note: This email and its content are subject to the disclaimer as displayed at the following link http://www.is.co.za/legal/E-mail+Confidentiality+Notice+and+Disclaimer.htm. Should you not have Web access, send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and a copy will be emailed to you. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
