-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > Most[1] large telcos I've seen[2] offering IP-VPN services tend to use > RFC1918 addressing for CE-PE infrastructure. Using public addressing for > much of this just often doesn't scale - thinking of some IP-VPNs which have > thousands of CE elements.
I just don't see how it doesn't scale with Public vs Private Space. The good point for Private Space (from Customer perspective) is that it can be reused when Customer changes provider (CE unmanaged case). Best Regards, - -- - -mat -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFItRSXIvBv0k5esR4RAmBoAJwIdBIAvM+ZIBCBZNN8kjhYOOpKsACgxOij 2uW0YWyj/Av1lo6lvUd6oxw= =/5og -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
