Sup32 - Sup2 is obsolete it's had a GREAT run we just took our last sup
2's out of production this year and they were installed in 2000 so in a
technology sense they were almost immortal
- Sup2 does not support ipv6 in hardware
- going forward Cisco will be supporting the Sup32 not the 2
Jeff Meyers wrote:
Hello list,
we're currently planning some ugprades for our network. We want to
remove all Layer-3 edge functionality away from our Juniper routers to
some Cisco 650x switch/router.
The requirements for this box are rather simple:
- redundante Management with a _very_ short fail-over time
- GigE right now is sufficient
- OSPF
- IPv4 and IPv6 routing in hardware
- only one OSPF database + all local routes + default-route of course
- ACLs of course for edge filters
Since our experience with those boxes is rather low, we are not sure
what exactly we need. A sup32 seems to be a good choise but is a lot
more expensive than e.g. a sup2. So will a sup2 do this job here?
Which daughterboards would we need? Is a modern IOS available for this
sup or is it even the same as those that are used on sup32 and sup720?
Does the sup2 support stateful fail-over, especially for ospf? Is 10G
possible with a sup2? Do the following modules work with the sup2:
WS-X6516-GE-TX
WS-X6516-GBIC
Is there a fixed bandwidt assigned to each slot or is the(32GBit?)
shared bus dynamically allocated to the linecards?
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/