* Rich Davies: > Has anyone ever utilized Unicast RPF (reverse path forwarding) to help > mitigate this limitation on the SUP2's? I have also ran into the same > limitation with our SUP2's (full BGP routing table, multiple peering > sessions) and I have read that enabling Unicast RPF would help temporarily > alleviate the TCAM memory being exhausted
On a MSFC2/PFC2, enabling uRPF cuts the number of available routes in half, so it makes things only worse. Don't know about more modern MSFCs, sorry. -- Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99 _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
